Content
82%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured, token-efficient skill body with concrete output shapes, executable check commands, and explicit validation gates over clearly sequenced workflows. The main improvement areas are naming specific reference files from the body and providing concrete output examples for the query and lint workflows.
Suggestions
Name the relevant reference files inline, e.g. 'lint report shape: see references/lint-report-v1.md' and 'discovery questions: see references/discovery-interview.md', so navigation does not depend on browsing the directory.
Add a compact example of a query answer with citations and an uncertainty marker, and a minimal lint-report row, mirroring the quality of the ingest example.
Present the ingest workflow as a numbered list so the sequence and the fail-fast checkpoint read as explicit steps rather than comma-joined prose.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean throughout: no explanations of concepts Claude already knows, terse one-line philosophy ('Cited local files beat remembered answers.'), and dense compact patterns (index rows, citation shapes, log rows). Every token earns its place, matching the lean-and-efficient anchor. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Mostly executable guidance: a complete ingest example with real paths, frontmatter, citation format, and log rows, plus runnable commands ('rg -n "\\[\\[[^]]+\\]\\]" wiki/' and 'find raw/assets -type f'). Minor gaps remain — the query and lint workflows have no inline output examples, keeping it just below fully copy-paste-ready coverage. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Workflows have a clear ordered sequence (classify → read → extract evidence → summarize → update pages → update index/log) and an explicit 'Update Gates' checklist with fail-fast validation, so the batch-operation cap does not apply. It falls short of the top anchor because steps are comma-joined prose rather than enumerated, and the failure policy is stop-on-gate rather than a fix-and-revalidate loop. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is self-contained for ordinary work and defers advanced material to a real, well-organized one-level-deep references/ bundle (7 files, each self-signaling its use case). However, the body points only to the directory generically ('Use references/ only for…') without naming which file serves which purpose, a minor navigation gap. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |