Content
100%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content is a dense, well-structured overview that combines concrete output shapes, executable commands, and explicit validation gates, with advanced detail appropriately deferred to a real, well-organized references/ bundle. It respects Claude's intelligence while adding only skill-specific policy.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and dense — sections like 'Philosophy: Cited local files beat remembered answers' and tight workflow sentences assume Claude's competence and add only non-obvious skill-specific policy, with every token earning its place. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete output shapes, a complete copy-paste ingest example with frontmatter/citations/wikilinks/index/log, and exact commands (`rg -n "\[\[[^]]+\]\]" wiki/`, `find raw/assets -type f`) give fully executable, copy-paste-ready guidance covering common cases. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Ingest, Query, and Lint workflows are clearly sequenced, and the 'Update Gates' section provides explicit fail-fast validation checkpoints with a feedback loop ('stop at the first failed gate; do not proceed'), matching the 5-anchor pattern for destructive/batch operations. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is a compact overview with a 'Progressive Disclosure' section that names exactly when to consult references/, and the verified references/ bundle (contract.yaml, discovery-interview.md, evals.yaml, lint-report-v1.md, obsidian-vault-contract.md, operating-contract.md, task-profile.json) are all real one-level-deep files clearly signaled by topic, giving easy navigation. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 20 / 20 Passed |