Content
57%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
Well-organized with strong progressive disclosure and real, one-level-deep references, but the body is somewhat padded and delegates the core executable workflow and sequence to referenced files, leaving the inline body more policy than procedure.
Suggestions
Trim padding — remove or tighten the 'Core Philosophy' bullets and the motivational 'Remember' line so every token earns its place.
Fold the redundant 'Read when' reference list into the existing Workflow/References sections to avoid restating the same paths twice.
Inline a brief numbered scaffold sequence (or at least the key steps) before pointing to workflow.md, so the body carries the workflow rather than only the validation tail.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly efficient policy prose with no generic concept explanations, but it carries padding — self-evident 'Core Philosophy' bullets, a motivational 'Remember' line, and a 'Read when' block that repeats references already listed under Workflow and References. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | It offers concrete validation commands and concrete examples, but the primary scaffold action is delegated ('Use the detailed scaffold procedure in references/workflow.md') rather than given as inline executable guidance. | 2 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | Validation checkpoints are explicit ('Fail fast: stop at first failed gate', a Validation section), but the multi-step scaffold sequence itself is not laid out in the body — it lives in the referenced workflow.md. | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | Clear sectioned overview with well-signaled one-level-deep references (verified real files in references/, scripts/, assets/) and a 'Read when' navigation map; no deep reference chaining. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 9 / 12 Passed |