CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

ui-ux-creative-coding

Build and audit polished interaction refinements for existing React or Tauri UI when motion, accessibility, reduced-motion, and browser-verified behavior need focused improvement.

59

Quality

68%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./Skills/frontend-ui/ui-ux-creative-coding/SKILL.md
SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

67%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The body is a well-organized, lean scaffolding/policy skill with clear sequencing, explicit fail-fast validation, and properly signaled references to real bundle files. The main gap is actionability: directives are concrete but lack executable commands or code.

Suggestions

Add at least one concrete executable example (e.g., a Playwright or screenshot verification command snippet) to lift actionability above 3.

Inline the validation checkpoint into the Workflow sequence (e.g., a numbered "verify and stop-on-fail" step) to move workflow clarity toward 5.

Provide a short motion-classification checklist or token-reuse examples so the "Classify each motion candidate" directive becomes directly actionable.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The body is lean and sectioned with terse bullets and no padding or basic-concept explanations, but a few policy statements (e.g., the context-disposition policy) could be tightened slightly, keeping it just below a 5.

4 / 5

Actionability

It gives concrete directives ("Scope one screen and up to 3 interaction clusters", "Classify each motion candidate", "Verify with browser screenshots or Playwright") but no executable commands or code, so guidance is directive rather than copy-paste ready.

3 / 5

Workflow Clarity

The Workflow section lays out a clear sequence and the Validation section adds an explicit fail-fast feedback loop ("stop at first failed gate; do not proceed until it is fixed and rerun"), but checkpoints live in a separate section rather than being woven inline into the sequence.

4 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

A dedicated Progressive Disclosure section clearly signals one-level-deep references to real bundle files (contract.yaml, evals.yaml, task-profile.json) with their purpose, but it also points to an external Infrastructure path that adds slight navigational complexity.

4 / 5

Total

15

/

20

Passed

Description

70%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description clearly scopes a distinct niche and supplies both a what and a when with strong trigger terms. It is held back from a 5 by somewhat abstract capability phrasing and a condition-based rather than user-quoted trigger clause.

Suggestions

Add concrete user-quoted trigger phrases (e.g., "Use when the user asks to polish micro-interactions, transitions, or hover/focus states") to lift completeness toward 5.

Replace the abstract "polished interaction refinements" with a short list of concrete actions (e.g., "build, audit, and tune transitions and micro-interactions") to raise specificity.

Include common synonyms (transitions, animations, micro-interactions) alongside motion to broaden trigger-term coverage.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Names the domain ("existing React or Tauri UI") and two concrete actions ("Build and audit"), but "polished interaction refinements" is somewhat abstract and coverage is not comprehensive, fitting the 1-2 concrete actions anchor rather than several.

3 / 5

Completeness

Explicitly states what ("Build and audit polished interaction refinements for existing React or Tauri UI") and provides an explicit when clause ("when motion, accessibility, reduced-motion, and browser-verified behavior need focused improvement"), but the when is condition-phrased rather than a concrete user trigger phrase.

4 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

Good coverage of natural terms users would say ("motion", "accessibility", "reduced-motion", "browser-verified behavior", "React", "Tauri"), though common synonyms such as transitions, micro-interactions, or animations are missing.

4 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

A clear niche (UI polish with motion/accessibility/reduced-motion evidence on React/Tauri) with distinct triggers and minimal conflict risk, though minor overlap remains with general web-development or accessibility skills.

4 / 5

Total

15

/

20

Passed

Validation

93%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation15 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

metadata_version

'metadata.version' is missing

Warning

Total

15

/

16

Passed

Repository
jscraik/Agent-Skills
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.