Content
85%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured, lean instruction-only skill body with a genuinely gated workflow, fail-fast validation, and disciplined progressive disclosure into real one-level reference files. The weakest areas are mild cross-section redundancy and the absence of a concrete worked example of the prescribed outputs.
Suggestions
Consolidate the verification caveats repeated across Workflow, Validation and Gotchas (administrator-access and saved-draft/publication points each appear twice) into a single section to save tokens.
Add one short worked example of a task-step block (heading with prerequisite, ordered action, expected result, safe recovery) so the prescribed output format is concrete for the create/edit mode.
Add a one-line sample located finding (location, user impact, practical correction) to make the review-mode output shape executable.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and instruction-dense with no padding explaining concepts Claude already knows, though a few verification caveats are restated across sections (administrator-access and saved-draft points each appear in both the Workflow/Validation sections and Gotchas). Not 5: that minor duplication could be consolidated; not 3: there is no unnecessary explanation, just small redundancy. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete editorial rules are given ("Preserve exact UI labels", "prerequisites before use, expected results near the action and safe recovery where known") plus a fixed report vocabulary ("pass, fail, blocked or not run") and conditional file-loading directives. Not 5: no worked example of a task-step block or a located finding, so the exact output shapes stay abstract; not 3: the guidance is specific and executable, not high-level hints. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The six-step workflow is clearly sequenced with explicit verification checkpoints (verify from the intended user's starting point, read back applied changes, repair introduced defects) and the Validation section adds fail-fast gating ("stop at the first failed gate and do not promote that result") with per-failure recovery including a bounded retry rule. Not 4: validation steps and error-recovery feedback loops are explicit, not merely present. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is a clear overview with well-signaled, one-level-deep references: all five cited files exist in references/, each with an explicit load condition (user-guide-quality.md at step 4; formats-and-context.md "only for dashboards, Office/export, online publishing or assessment requirements"), and companion skills are marked optional. Not 4: there are no organization gaps — navigation and conditional loading are explicit. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |