Content
92%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A tight, well-organized instruction skill with clear sequencing and validation feedback loops. The only gap is the absence of a concrete output template or worked hook example to push actionability to fully executable.
Suggestions
Add a concrete output template or one worked hook example (e.g. a sample hook set with promise/payoff annotations) to make guidance copy-paste ready.
Optionally include a short example of an 'evidence gap' note format to concretize the evidence-bound claims constraint.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and well-structured, assuming Claude's competence without explaining basic concepts like what YouTube or retention is; every section earns its place. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | The Workflow, Inputs, Outputs, and Examples sections give mostly concrete, actionable guidance, but lack a concrete output template or worked hook example, leaving a minor gap versus fully executable guidance. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear six-step sequence is paired with an explicit Validation section and fail-fast feedback loop ('stop at the first failed gate ... rerun'), satisfying explicit validation checkpoints and error recovery. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Clean sectioned overview with one-level-deep, clearly signaled references to real files (contract.yaml, evals.yaml, task-profile.json verified present in ./references/) and a deferred archived context path. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 19 / 20 Passed |