Content
100%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
This is an excellent skill that practices what it preaches—terse, actionable, and well-structured. The before/after examples are highly effective at teaching the desired output format. The Auto-Clarity escape hatch and Boundaries section show thoughtful design, preventing the skill from being applied inappropriately.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Every section earns its place. No explanation of what code review is, no padding. The examples are the longest part and they serve a clear purpose—showing the before/after contrast. The severity prefixes are tightly defined with no fluff. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | The format template (`L<line>: <problem>. <fix>.`) is copy-paste ready. The examples are concrete with exact line numbers, emoji prefixes, and specific fixes. The Drop/Keep lists give precise, actionable constraints rather than vague guidance. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | This is a single-task skill (write terse review comments) with an unambiguous workflow: apply format, use severity prefix, follow drop/keep rules. The Auto-Clarity section adds a clear exception pathway for when to break terse mode. The Boundaries section clearly scopes what the skill does and doesn't do. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | For a standalone skill under 50 lines with no need for external references, the content is well-organized into logical sections (Rules, Examples, Auto-Clarity, Boundaries) that are easy to scan. No bundle files are needed and none are referenced. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 12 / 12 Passed |