Content
82%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A tight, well-structured router skill with concrete endpoints and a sound eligibility decision matrix. The main gaps are the missing in-body executable request examples and a broken reference to a non-existent examples/verify.md file.
Suggestions
Remove or create the referenced ./examples/verify.md file — the link currently points to a non-existent bundle path.
Add a minimal inline curl or request-body example for the POST /tokens/v2/verify/express/execute endpoint so the core action is executable without loading the reference.
Make the execute-step recovery loop explicit (e.g. 'if execute returns an error, surface verificationError and re-check eligibility before retrying') to strengthen the validation checkpoint.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean and efficient with no over-explanation of Solana/Jupiter concepts; every section (intent router, decision matrix, operating rules) earns its tokens. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete endpoints, HTTP methods, and path parameters plus a decision matrix give mostly executable guidance, but the body has no request payloads or runnable commands — those are deferred to the API reference. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear eligibility → craft → execute sequence with the decision-matrix STOP row acting as a validation gate for the irreversible payment; minor recovery-loop detail is implicit rather than explicit. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized overview with one-level-deep references and the API bulk correctly split into references/api-reference.md, but the body links ./examples/verify.md which does not exist in the bundle. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |