Content
87%Weight 40%Scale 1-3Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A tight, highly actionable skill body with well-organized sections and a verified script reference. The main gap is the absence of validation/verification steps around the destructive restart and upgrade operations.
Suggestions
Add a verification step to the upgrade flow, e.g. run 'python scripts/mp-update.py versions' before and after upgrade to confirm the version changed.
Make the recommended sequence explicit for an upgrade scenario (check versions → upgrade → re-check versions), so the validation loop is signaled rather than implied.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean and efficient: every section earns its place with executable commands and the genuinely-needed auto-update flag logic, with no padding or explanation of concepts Claude already knows. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | Fully executable, copy-paste-ready commands for each operation (versions, restart, upgrade, upgrade dev) plus direct API examples, matching the score-3 anchor. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | Each action is unambiguous, but restart/upgrade are destructive operations and the body provides no verification checkpoint (e.g. check versions before/after), so workflow clarity is capped at 2 per the destructive-operations guideline. | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized into Setup, Preferred Commands, Direct API Examples, and Notes, with the referenced script (scripts/mp-update.py) verified to exist as a one-level-deep reference. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |