Content
75%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-organized, actionable instruction skill with a clear sequenced execution workflow and explicit boundaries. Scores are held at 4 rather than 5 by minor slack (duplicate audit/related-skill info, a missing referenced file, and slightly subjective completion criteria).
Suggestions
Remove or fix the dangling '见 test-results.md' reference—either add the file to references/ or delete the line, since progressive_disclosure penalizes references to absent files.
Trim the 审计信息 and 相关 skills sections, which duplicate frontmatter (related_skills) and add no runtime guidance, to improve conciseness.
Tighten the completion criteria for the subjective Execution steps (e.g., step 4 '清理一个秘密') with a more concrete pass/fail test so actionability can reach 5.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is efficient and assumes competence, using compact quotes and numbered points; minor trim opportunities exist in the 审计信息 block and the 相关 skills section, which duplicate frontmatter. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | The E section gives four concrete steps each with a 完成标准 (completion criterion) and one 判停条件 (stop condition), yielding mostly executable guidance; a couple of criteria like '清理一个秘密' are somewhat subjective. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clearly sequenced four-step workflow with completion-criteria checkpoints and an explicit stop condition; no feedback/retry loop, but none is required for a reflective non-destructive task. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | A single self-contained file with well-labeled R/I/A1/A2/E/B sections and clear navigation; the only gap is a dangling reference to test-results.md, which is not present in the bundle. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |