Content
67%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured R-I-A-A2-E-B framework with concrete execution steps and clear boundaries, evaluated as an instruction skill. It loses points mainly to book-case retelling and audit-metadata noise rather than to structural problems.
Suggestions
Trim the A1 book-case retellings and the 审计信息 footer (验证通过/蒸馏时间) to reduce tokens and remove time-sensitive noise, or move audit info to a separate file.
Make step 5 ('重算自由进度') executable by giving an explicit formula or template for the 被动收入/支出 ratio rather than leaving it as '计算…比值'.
Either create the referenced test-results.md or remove the dangling '见 test-results.md' link so navigation references all resolve.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The core methodology (I/E/B) is lean, but the A1 section retells two book cases in detail that overlap with I, and the 审计信息 footer (验证通过, 蒸馏时间: 2026-08-01) adds time-stamped metadata noise that could be trimmed. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | The E section gives five concrete numbered steps each with a 完成标准 and step 1 with a 判停条件, but steps like '计算被动收入/支出比值' stay conceptual rather than giving a ready-to-run formula. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Five steps are clearly sequenced with completion-criteria checkpoints and an explicit stop condition on step 1; later steps lack error-recovery feedback loops, keeping it just below a 5. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is well organized into labeled R/I/A1/A2/E/B sections and is appropriately self-contained for a single-purpose skill, though the dangling '见 test-results.md' reference (file absent) and audit footer are minor organization blemishes. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 15 / 20 Passed |