Content
75%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured, actionable instruction skill built on a clear R/I/A/E/B scaffold with explicit completion criteria and a safety stop-condition. It is held just below top marks by mild redundancy and a dangling reference to a test-results file that is not bundled.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Dense and mostly efficient — the R/I/A1/A2/E/B structure carries content that earns its place without explaining concepts Claude already knows; minor token waste in the 审计信息 block and the repeated 相关 skills section. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | The E section gives four concrete steps with explicit 完成标准 ('列出你真实履历中最有意义的3件事', '用一句话写下你的意义主张'), which is specific and executable for an instruction-only skill, with only minor gaps. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The four-step Execution section is clearly sequenced, each step carries a 完成标准 checkpoint, and step 1 has an explicit 判停条件 (acute crisis -> refer out) as a safety gate; not a full validate-fix-retry loop, so it stops short of 5. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | No bundle files exist, and the body is well organized into clearly labeled sections; the lone inline reference ('见 test-results.md') points to a file that is not present in any bundle directory, a minor dangling-reference gap. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |