Content
75%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-organized instruction-only skill with a clear RIAE/B structure, concrete execution steps with stop-conditions, and explicit boundaries including author blind spots. Consistently strong across dimensions, narrowly missing 5s due to minor verbosity (source quote + audit metadata) and lack of explicit error-recovery loops.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The RIAE/B body is lean and assumes Claude's competence without explaining basic concepts; held below 5 by the somewhat long source quote (R) and the trailing 审计信息 metadata (e.g. '蒸馏时间: 2026-08-01') that earns little for the skill's purpose. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | The E section gives four concrete decision steps each with 完成标准 and 判停条件 (e.g. '回答「十年后它还值多少」', '若答案是「不可复利且只是快钱」，标记为短期游戏'); mostly executable guidance with minor gaps, just short of copy-paste-ready precision. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Steps are clearly sequenced (1–4) with embedded validation via 判停条件 and a feedback signal in step 1 (mark short-term games and pause); not a 5 because there is no explicit re-loop instruction for failed checks and step 2's gate is binary without recovery guidance. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Single-file skill with no bundle present and clean R/I/A1/A2/E/B sectioning plus a 相关 skills pointer; well-organized with no nested references. Below 5 because some content (case studies A1, 审计信息) could be offloaded to keep the overview leaner. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |