Content
63%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is well-structured with a clear methodology skeleton, concrete executable steps with completion criteria, and honest boundary/limitation sections. Its main weaknesses are duplication with the frontmatter (triggers, related skills), a dangling reference to a non-existent test-results.md, and audit/audit-like content inflating the token budget without operational payoff.
Suggestions
Remove the '见 test-results.md' reference or actually include the file — it currently points at a file that does not exist in the bundle.
Deduplicate: the I section's principles and the A2 trigger/语言信号 lists restate the frontmatter description almost verbatim; keep one authoritative copy and use the body only for what the description cannot hold.
Trim or relocate the 审计信息 section (V1/V2/V3 checks, 蒸馏时间) — it has no operational value for executing the skill and inflates the token budget.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The book-specific content earns its tokens (no generic concept explanations), but the frontmatter's 核心理念 and trigger phrases are restated nearly verbatim in the I and A2 sections, related skills are listed twice, and the 审计信息 section adds no operational value — it could be meaningfully tightened. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | The E section gives concrete, executable habit guidance with per-step 完成标准 ('每天固定 1–2 小时...连续 7 天不断', '每周写/讲一次') and a 判停条件. Not 5: step 3's '找到 1–2 本奠基原著' leaves the how open, and guidance is advisory rather than copy-paste ready. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Four clearly sequenced steps each carry a completion criterion, and step 1 has an explicit abort condition ('若读得痛苦超过 20 分钟，换一本或跳读'). Not 5: checkpoints are advisory criteria rather than validate-then-proceed gates, and only one step has a stop condition. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Sections are well-organized, but the body references '见 test-results.md' and no such file exists anywhere in the bundle (references/, scripts/, assets/ are all absent) — a dangling reference that breaks navigation. At ~120 lines with audit info and case studies that could live in separate files, organization could be better. | 3 / 5 |
Total | 14 / 20 Passed |