Content
78%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is concise, actionable, and well-structured with clear checkpoints and boundaries. It stops just short of perfect on actionability and workflow clarity where explicit recovery feedback loops would push it higher.
Suggestions
Add an explicit error-recovery feedback loop in the E section (e.g. 'if the 7-day streak breaks, restart from step 1 and note the blocker') to reach a 5 on workflow clarity.
Trim the 审计信息 footer (验证通过/蒸馏时间) or move it to a separate audit file to improve conciseness.
Consider adding one concrete 'how to find foundational 原著 for a new field' micro-procedure to close the actionability gap.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean and well-organized R/I/A/E/B structure that assumes competence and avoids explaining basic concepts; minor padding in the 审计信息 section keeps it just below the 5-anchor. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | The E section provides concrete executable steps each with a '完成标准' and '判停条件' (e.g. '读得痛苦超过20分钟，换一本或跳读'), offering mostly copy-ready guidance with only minor gaps. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear 4-step execution sequence with explicit completion criteria and stop-conditions acting as checkpoints; not quite the full validate→fix→retry feedback loop of the 5-anchor. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | A single-purpose, well-structured skill under 50 effective lines with no bundle files; sections are clearly organized and navigable, meeting the simple-skill exception for a top score. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |