CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

build-brightstaff

Build the brightstaff native binary. Use when brightstaff code changes.

68

Quality

83%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

100%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The body is a model of token efficiency: one exact command with a single sentence of failure guidance and nothing else. As a simple, single-action skill it fully satisfies the rubric's exceptions for workflow clarity and progressive disclosure.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The body is four lines: a one-line instruction, a copy-paste command, and one sentence of failure guidance. There is no padding and no explanation of concepts Claude already knows, matching the 'lean and efficient; every token earns its place' anchor.

5 / 5

Actionability

'cd crates && cargo build --release -p brightstaff' is a fully executable, copy-paste-ready command that covers the common case exactly. This matches the level-5 anchor and exceeds level 4, which allows minor gaps in executability.

5 / 5

Workflow Clarity

This is a simple single-task skill whose one action is unambiguous, and 'If the build fails, diagnose and fix the errors' supplies a failure feedback loop. Per the rubric's simple-skill exception, a clear single action warrants 5; the operation is not destructive or batch, so no cap applies.

5 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

The skill is under 50 lines with no external references needed — there is nothing to offload, and no bundle files exist to organize. Per the rubric's simple-skill exception, short skills with no need for external references can score 5 on well-organized content, which this trivially satisfies.

5 / 5

Total

20

/

20

Passed

Description

66%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description is concise, in third person, and explicitly states both what the skill does and when to use it. It is held back by thin action coverage and sparse natural trigger terms — the single verb 'build' and the bare 'brightstaff code changes' leave common phrasings like 'compile' or 'cargo build' uncovered.

Suggestions

Add one or two more concrete actions or details, e.g. 'Build the brightstaff native binary in release mode with cargo' to make the 'what' more comprehensive.

Broaden the trigger vocabulary in the 'when' clause, e.g. 'Use when brightstaff code changes, when asked to compile or rebuild the brightstaff binary, or after editing Rust code under crates/'.

Mention the toolchain or repo location (cargo, crates/) in the description so users referencing those terms naturally trigger this skill.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

The phrase 'Build the brightstaff native binary' names the domain and exactly one concrete action, with no further specifics about what the build involves. This matches the anchor for naming a domain with 1-2 concrete actions but not comprehensive coverage, and falls short of the level-4 anchor requiring several specific actions.

3 / 5

Completeness

It explicitly answers both parts: what ('Build the brightstaff native binary') and when ('Use when brightstaff code changes'). The 'when' clause is present but terse and could be more explicit — e.g. naming the cargo/Rust context — which matches the level-4 anchor rather than the fully concrete level-5 example.

4 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

Terms like 'build', 'brightstaff', 'native binary', and 'code changes' are relevant, but natural variations a user would say — 'compile', 'cargo build', 'release build', 'Rust changes' — are absent. This matches 'some relevant keywords but missing common variations or synonyms' rather than the good-coverage level 4.

3 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

The project-specific name 'brightstaff' creates a clear niche with distinct triggers, and no other skill category would plausibly compete for this trigger. This matches the 'clear niche with distinct triggers; minimal conflict risk' anchor, and is clearly above the level-4 anchor that assumes overlap risk with closely related skills.

5 / 5

Total

15

/

20

Passed

Validation

100%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 16 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Repository
katanemo/plano
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.