build-brightstaff

Build the brightstaff native binary. Use when brightstaff code changes.

Quality

87%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

Securityby

Passed

No findings from the security scan

Quality

Content

100%

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The body is lean, fully executable, and appropriately scoped for a single build task, with an explicit error-recovery clause and no unnecessary references. Nothing material is missing for a skill of this size.

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Conciseness	The body is a one-line heading, a single executable command, and one recovery sentence with no padding or explanation of concepts Claude already knows, so every token earns its place.	3 / 3
Actionability	"cd crates && cargo build --release -p brightstaff" is a complete, copy-paste-ready executable command rather than pseudocode or vague direction.	3 / 3
Workflow Clarity	For this simple single-task skill the action is unambiguous, and "If the build fails, diagnose and fix the errors" supplies an explicit error-recovery feedback loop, satisfying the simple-skill allowance.	3 / 3
Progressive Disclosure	The skill is well under 50 lines, needs no external references (no bundle files exist), and the single-purpose content is neatly organized into a heading, code block, and note, meeting the simple-skill criterion.	3 / 3
	Total	12 / 12 Passed

Description

75%

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description cleanly covers both what the skill does and when to use it, with a distinct, low-conflict trigger. It is let down only by listing a single action and a narrow set of trigger phrases.

Suggestions

Broaden the action list slightly, e.g. "Build and release-compile the brightstaff native binary," to reach the top specificity anchor.

Add common trigger variations, e.g. "Use when brightstaff code changes, or when you need to rebuild/compile the brightstaff binary."

Consider naming the output artifact (e.g. the binary path) so the trigger and outcome are more concrete.

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Specificity	"Build the brightstaff native binary" names the domain and one concrete action (building a native binary), but only a single action rather than the multiple specific actions the top anchor requires.	2 / 3
Completeness	"Build the brightstaff native binary" states what it does and "Use when brightstaff code changes" gives an explicit when trigger, clearly answering both what and when.	3 / 3
Trigger Term Quality	"Use when brightstaff code changes" provides one relevant trigger phrase, but coverage is thin with no common variations (e.g. compile, rebuild, after editing brightstaff), matching the middle anchor.	2 / 3
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk	The description is tied to a specific named binary (brightstaff) with a distinct trigger, giving it a clear niche unlikely to conflict with other skills.	3 / 3
	Total	10 / 12 Passed

Validation

100%

Warnings & errors only

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 16 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Repository: katanemo/plano
Path: .claude/skills/build-brightstaff/SKILL.md
Commit: d23e276

Reviewed: 4 days ago

Table of Contents

Discovery Implementation Validation

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.