CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

plano-advanced-patterns

Design advanced Plano architectures. Use for multi-listener systems, prompt target schema quality, and layered orchestration patterns.

63

Quality

73%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./skills/plano-advanced-patterns/SKILL.md
SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

72%

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The body is admirably concise and well-organized into clear sections, but its checklist stays at the level of principles without concrete executable examples or validation checkpoints. Adding a worked example and an explicit validate-then-proceed step would raise actionability and workflow clarity.

Suggestions

Add a concrete worked example (e.g., a minimal multi-listener config or a strict prompt-target schema snippet) so the checklist is copy-paste ready rather than advisory.

Insert an explicit validation checkpoint into the checklist (e.g., 'Verify tool-call schemas parse before deploying; re-check after each routing change') to create a validate-fix-retry loop.

Show how to apply the two named rules (advanced-multi-listener, advanced-prompt-targets) with a brief before/after or minimal code, turning references into actionable guidance.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The body is lean with no padding and no over-explanation of concepts Claude already knows; every line (triggers, rules, checklist) earns its place.

3 / 3

Actionability

The checklist gives principles ('Define prompt target parameters with strict, explicit schemas', 'Minimize ambiguity that causes malformed tool calls') but no concrete code, commands, or worked examples to copy, so guidance describes rather than instructs.

2 / 3

Workflow Clarity

A numbered 1-5 checklist provides a clear sequence, but there are no explicit validation checkpoints despite mentioning 'test scenarios' and fragile routing/function-calling work; checkpoints are only implicit.

2 / 3

Progressive Disclosure

Under 50 lines with no need for external references, the content is split into clearly organized sections (When To Use, Apply These Rules, Execution Checklist), which is appropriate for a simple skill.

3 / 3

Total

10

/

12

Passed

Description

75%

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description clearly answers both what and when with a distinct, niche trigger set, but its action verbs and natural-language trigger term coverage are only partially developed. Tightening 'Design' into concrete actions and adding common user phrasings would lift specificity and trigger quality.

Suggestions

Replace the generic verb 'Design' with concrete actions (e.g., 'Structure multi-listener Plano systems, define strict prompt target schemas, and orchestrate layered listener pipelines').

Add natural user phrasings to the 'Use for' clause so trigger terms match what users actually say (e.g., 'multiple listeners', 'prompt schema', 'listener routing').

Clarify the Plano scope with a one-word qualifier so it is unmistakable this is the Plano framework rather than generic architecture.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Names the Plano domain and several targets ('multi-listener systems', 'prompt target schema quality', 'layered orchestration patterns') but uses the vague verb 'Design' rather than listing multiple concrete actions like a score-3 anchor.

2 / 3

Completeness

Explicitly states what it does ('Design advanced Plano architectures') and when to use it ('Use for multi-listener systems...'), satisfying both the what and when with an explicit trigger clause.

3 / 3

Trigger Term Quality

Includes some relevant terms ('multi-listener', 'prompt target schema', 'layered orchestration') but they lean technical; common natural user variations are missing, so coverage is partial.

2 / 3

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

The 'Plano' niche plus specific triggers (multi-listener, layered orchestration) form a clear, distinct scope unlikely to fire for unrelated skills.

3 / 3

Total

10

/

12

Passed

Validation

100%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation16 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Repository
katanemo/plano
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.