Content
68%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content is admirably concise and well-structured for a short architecture skill, but its actionability is weakened by rule references that resolve to nothing and a checklist of principles rather than an executable, validated workflow.
Suggestions
Define or inline the referenced rules (advanced-multi-listener, advanced-prompt-targets) so the 'Apply These Rules' section is self-contained, or add the missing bundle files.
Convert the advisory checklist into a concrete procedural sequence with at least one verification step (e.g., 'Validate that listener interfaces are distinct before combining').
Add a short concrete example (e.g., a minimal multi-listener config snippet) to lift actionability from principle-level to executable.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and under 50 lines, assumes Claude's competence, explains no background concepts, and every line earns its place. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | The checklist gives concrete-ish principles ('Define prompt target parameters with strict, explicit schemas') but the 'Apply These Rules' section references rule IDs (advanced-multi-listener, advanced-prompt-targets) that are never defined, leaving key details missing. | 3 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A numbered Execution Checklist is present, but the items are advisory principles rather than a true procedural sequence and lack any validation checkpoints. | 3 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Sections (When To Use, Apply These Rules, Execution Checklist) are well organized for a sub-50-line skill, but the referenced rule IDs point to no bundle files that exist, a minor organization gap. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 15 / 20 Passed |