Content
85%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured, concise skill body with a clear sequenced checklist and verification step. It would be stronger with concrete config examples rather than naming rules and fields abstractly.
Suggestions
Add an executable config snippet showing a configured MCP filter (type, transport, tool fields) so guidance is copy-paste ready rather than abstract.
Include a concrete example of a clear, actionable rejection message and a blocked/allowed test prompt pair to make the verification step tangible.
Briefly state what the referenced rules ('filter-mcp', 'filter-guardrails', 'filter-ordering') entail or link to where their content lives, instead of listing bare names.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean — short sections, bullets, and a numbered checklist with no concept-explanation padding, assuming Claude's competence so every token earns its place. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | It names concrete fields ('type', 'transport', 'tool') and an explicit ordering, but provides no executable config snippets or examples and references rules by name without showing their content, leaving key details incomplete. | 2 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | A numbered five-step checklist with an explicit verification step (step 5) gives a clear sequence; filter configuration is not a destructive/batch operation, so the missing retry loop does not cap the score. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | At under 50 lines with no external references needed, the well-organized sections (When To Use, Apply These Rules, Execution Checklist) meet the simple-skill allowance for a top score without bundle files. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |