Content
61%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A genuinely token-efficient, well-organized orchestrator skill whose structure and trigger list are exemplary. Its weakness is actionability: every directive is abstract, with no concrete `planoai trace` invocations, sampling configuration, or trace-query examples to execute, and validation exists only as implication rather than as an explicit checkpoint.
Suggestions
Add one or two concrete, copy-pasteable examples under the checklist — e.g., an actual `planoai trace` command with a filter for route or latency inspection, and a sample trace query — so 'Use planoai trace filters' and 'trace query-based root-cause analysis' become executable rather than aspirational.
Show the concrete form of step 1 and step 2: the environment variable or config used to enable tracing per environment, and a short example of a static and a header-derived span attribute, since these are the skill's own named capabilities.
Turn the implicit validation in steps 4–5 into an explicit checkpoint (e.g., 'Verify the trace exists and shows the expected route before drawing conclusions; if not, re-check sampling and retry'), and point to where the `observe-*` rules are found so the Apply These Rules section is navigable.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean — a one-line purpose statement, a four-item trigger list, three rule names, and a five-item checklist — with zero padding and no explanation of concepts Claude already knows. It matches the 'lean and efficient; assumes Claude's competence; every token earns its place' anchor and is not a 4 because there is nothing identifiable to trim. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | The checklist is high-level hints — 'Enable tracing with environment-appropriate sampling', 'Use `planoai trace` filters to isolate route and latency issues' — with no executable commands, no environment variable or config example, no trace-query syntax, and no sample span attributes, matching the 'high-level hints but missing the specific steps to execute' anchor. It is not a 3 because even the one named tool, `planoai trace`, is given without a single concrete invocation, and step 5 demands 'exact commands' without providing any. | 2 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The five-step Execution Checklist gives a coherent sequence (enable tracing, add attributes, query traces, reason from evidence, return reproduction commands), matching 'steps listed but validation gaps; sequence present but checkpoints missing or implicit'. It is not a 4 because validation is only implied — steps 4–5 gesture at evidence and validation but there is no explicit checkpoint or feedback loop (e.g., verify a trace actually appeared before querying it). | 3 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The skill is under 50 lines with no bundle files, and its four sections (purpose, When To Use, Apply These Rules, Execution Checklist) are well organized, so it earns the simple-skill credit. It is not a 5 because the 'Apply These Rules' entries (`observe-tracing`, `observe-span-attributes`, `observe-trace-query`) give no pointer to where those rules live, leaving a minor navigation gap. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 14 / 20 Passed |