Content
65%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is concise and well-sectioned with a sequenced checklist, but its rules are unexplained dangling references and its guidance stops short of executable detail with no error-recovery loop.
Suggestions
Add a concrete config example or file path for each rule (e.g. show how `default: true` is set) so the checklist is copy-paste ready.
Add an explicit error-recovery step after validation, e.g. 'If traces show wrong routing, adjust the matching preference and re-validate.'
Either explain the `routing-*` rules inline or link them to actual reference files with paths, so the 'Apply These Rules' section is not a dangling reference.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean with no conceptual padding; every line (When To Use triggers, rule list, checklist) earns its place and assumes Claude's competence. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | Checklist items like 'Ensure exactly one default: true provider' are specific, but 'Rewrite vague preference descriptions' and 'Validate routing behavior using trace-based checks' lack executable detail, and the `routing-*` rule identifiers are referenced without explanation or file paths. | 2 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The numbered Execution Checklist provides a clear sequence and a validation step, but lacks an explicit error-recovery feedback loop or checkpoints stating when it is safe to proceed. | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | Sections are well organized for a short skill, but the 'Apply These Rules' entries (routing-default, routing-aliases, etc.) are dangling references with no inline explanation or file navigation, so signaling is incomplete. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 9 / 12 Passed |