Content
80%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The skill body is concise, actionable, and well-structured for a simple batch task, but lacks a validation checkpoint confirming all 12 files were correctly updated before the lock step. Adding a verification step would lift the workflow_clarity cap.
Suggestions
Add an explicit verification step after the edits, e.g. 'Run `grep -R "<old-version>" .` and confirm zero matches before running `uv lock`' to ensure no file was missed.
Specify the version-string replacement approach (e.g. the literal old→new string substitution or a sed/grep command) so the per-file edit is unambiguous across formats.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and assumes competence: a tight file list, one concrete lock command, and a justified exclusion ('Do NOT change version strings in *.lock files or Cargo.lock'). Every line earns its place with no padding or over-explanation. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete file list and an exact command ('cd cli && uv lock') with worked examples ('0.4.11 → 0.4.12'), but the per-file edit method (how to locate/replace the version string) is left implicit. Not a 5 because the search/replace detail for each file is unspecified; not a 3 because guidance is mostly executable. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear sequence (read version → update files → lock → summary) with a confirm-with-user checkpoint, but this is a batch operation across 12 files with no step verifying every file was actually updated. Per the rubric cap, a destructive/batch skill without validation cannot score above 3. | 3 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | A short (<50 line) single-purpose skill with no external references needed; content is well-organized into intro, file list, exclusions, lock step, and summary. Per the simple-skill exception this warrants the top score. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |