Content
88%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a strong, action-first instruction file: concrete executable commands, an explicit input-validation gate, error-recovery paths, and worked examples for the common invocations. Its only weaknesses are minor boilerplate padding and detail (notably the Panels subsection) that could be moved to a reference file if the skill grows.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is efficient overall — the temporal-leakage definition ("information that would not yet be available at the point in time it represents — also called peekahead, future leakage, or temporal leakage") is genuinely non-obvious domain knowledge, and the sandbox note is operational guidance Claude would not know. It falls short of lean because of boilerplate like "These instructions are guidelines, not a rigid script... Use the conversation context. Skip steps that are already satisfied," matching the anchor for minor over-explanation that could be trimmed. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Fully executable, copy-paste-ready commands are given: `roborev review --branch --wait --type lookahead [--panel <name>|none]`, the heredoc base-ref validation with `git rev-parse --verify --end-of-options "$branch"`, and recovery commands (`roborev status`, `roborev init`). The Examples section covers the common cases with concrete complete invocations like `roborev review --branch --wait --type lookahead --base develop`. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear four-step sequence (validate inputs → build and run the command → present the results → offer next steps) with an explicit validation gate ("If validation fails, inform the user the ref is invalid. Do not proceed.") and error-recovery guidance for daemon/repo failures. The review operation is read-only, so the destructive/batch validation cap does not apply; this matches the anchor for a clear sequence with explicit validation and error feedback. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Sections are well-organized (Usage, Instructions, Panels, Examples, See also) and the "See also" links provide navigation to sibling skills, with no nested or dead references. However, all detail — including the multi-paragraph Panels subsection and the inline base-branch command snippet — lives in SKILL.md (~135 lines) with no split into reference files, matching the anchor for good structure with minor organization gaps rather than the fully split, reference-per-topic anchor. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |