CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

fetch-resilience-score

Retrieve the composite country resilience score (0-100) and its domain/pillar breakdown for a single country. Use when the user asks how resilient a country is, or wants its numeric resilience score, trend, or per-domain breakdown.

73

Quality

92%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide
SecuritybySnyk

High

Do not use without reviewing

SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

96%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

An exemplary API-fetch skill body: concrete endpoint, auth, and parameter details, a copy-paste worked example, a field-by-field response guide, explicit error meanings, and a 'When NOT to use' section that prevents misuse. Its only structural weakness is that the fairly large inline response schema keeps it just short of ideal progressive disclosure.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

Every section earns its place (auth, endpoint, params, response shape with field semantics, worked example, errors, when-not-to-use, references) with no padding and no explanation of concepts Claude already knows. The response JSON is necessary contract detail, not verbosity, matching the lean anchor-5 profile.

5 / 5

Actionability

The skill gives a full executable GET with the auth header shown concretely, a parameter table, a copy-paste curl|jq worked example, and a complete response schema with per-field agent guidance — fully copy-paste ready, matching anchor 5.

5 / 5

Workflow Clarity

This is a single unambiguous action (one authenticated GET), so the simple-skill exception applies; the Errors section maps 400/401/403/404/429 to concrete causes, providing the error-recovery checkpoint. No destructive or batch operation exists to trigger the workflow cap.

5 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

Sections are well organized and the References block gives clearly signaled one-level-deep links (OpenAPI, auth matrix, methodology). It is not 5 because the body is ~100 lines (above the simple-skill 50-line threshold) with the full inline response-shape JSON acting as inlined API reference, which could partly live in a separate file.

4 / 5

Total

19

/

20

Passed

Description

87%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

A strong description: it states a concrete, bounded capability with the numeric range, and gives an explicit 'Use when...' clause with natural trigger phrases covering score, trend, and per-domain breakdown. Third-person imperative voice is used correctly and there is no filler.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

"Retrieve the composite country resilience score (0-100) and its domain/pillar breakdown for a single country" names several specific actions with the numeric range made explicit. It is not a 5 because no further actions (ranking, comparison, history) are listed, and not a 3 because coverage is complete for what this skill does.

4 / 5

Completeness

Both what ("Retrieve the composite country resilience score (0-100) and its domain/pillar breakdown for a single country") and when ("Use when the user asks how resilient a country is, or wants its numeric resilience score, trend, or per-domain breakdown") are explicit with concrete trigger phrases, matching the anchor-5 example.

5 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

"how resilient a country is", "numeric resilience score, trend, or per-domain breakdown" are natural phrases a user would say. A few natural synonyms (e.g. "resilience index", "country comparison") are missing, placing this between anchor 4 and 5 but noticeably above the midpoint, so 4 rather than 5.

4 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

The per-country resilience-score trigger set is a clear niche ("how resilient a country is", "numeric resilience score") with minimal overlap risk against ranking or narrative-brief skills, matching the anchor-5 example's structure.

5 / 5

Total

18

/

20

Passed

Validation

93%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 15 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

frontmatter_unknown_keys

Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata

Warning

Total

15

/

16

Passed

Repository
koala73/worldmonitor
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.