Content
96%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is an efficient, fully executable reference for a single GET endpoint with explicit error and edge-case handling. Structure is clean; the only gap is that no bundled sub-files exist to demonstrate the well-signaled split-content pattern that the top progressive-disclosure anchor rewards.
Suggestions
Consider moving the full response-shape and enum reference into a bundled REFERENCE.md and linking to it from the body to push progressive disclosure toward anchor 5.
Add a short explicit retry/backoff recipe for 429 (e.g. a one-line 'retry after 1s, then 4s') to make the feedback loop copy-paste ready.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean and nearly all token-earning — endpoint, parameter table, JSON response shape, one curl example, error codes, and routing — with no padding explaining markets, APIs, or JSON; the verbatim enum values are actionable spec material rather than over-explanation. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Fully executable: real endpoint URL, a concrete auth header example, parameter table with example values, full JSON response shape, and a copy-paste curl+jq pipeline covering the common multi-symbol case. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A single read-only GET with unambiguous guidance plus explicit checkpoint-style handling — inspect unavailableSymbols, interpret rateLimited/finnhubSkipped, retry 429 with backoff, and the 'When NOT to use' routing — so the simple-skill exception applies and no destructive/batch cap is triggered. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized into clearly labeled sections with one-level-deep external reference links (OpenAPI, auth matrix, docs); stops short of anchor 5 because bulk spec content is inline rather than split into well-signaled separate bundled files. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 19 / 20 Passed |