Content
88%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a tightly organized, executable reference for a single REST endpoint with concrete parameters, a real response example, and a runnable worked example. It loses only minor points for slight verbosity in the auth section and modest file-decomposition opportunities.
Suggestions
Trim the Authentication header-semantics explanation to the minimum needed (key header vs. bearer) to tighten token efficiency.
Consider moving the full response-shape JSON into a references/ file and keeping only 2-3 key fields inline to improve progressive disclosure.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is sectioned and lean with no padding about what ACLED/GDELT/RSS are, but the Authentication section spends tokens clarifying header semantics and no-op fields that could be trimmed slightly, so it sits just below the fully lean anchor. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | It provides a concrete endpoint URL, a parameters table with exact shapes, a full response JSON example, and a copy-paste-ready curl+node+jq worked example covering the common case, matching the fully-executable anchor. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | As a single API-call skill the action is unambiguous, and it includes explicit verification guidance (cross-check /api/health, retry on empty events, backoff on 429), satisfying the simple-skill exception at the top anchor. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Content is well-organized into clearly labeled sections with one-level-deep external references (OpenAPI, auth matrix) in a References block, but at ~100 lines with no bundle split it is good rather than optimally decomposed, fitting just below the clear-overview-with-split anchor. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |