Content
81%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A tightly written orchestration manual with excellent workflow sequencing, validation gates, and feedback loops for destructive operations, and a clean one-level reference structure. The weaknesses are restated policy that could be consolidated, a few underspecified steps (parsing, reviewer spawning), and one out-of-bundle script dependency that is not clearly resolvable.
Suggestions
State the approval protocol and the shared intent-guard sentence once in a single section and reference it from the modes instead of repeating it in 'Invocation and approval', C1-C2, C2.6, and 'upgrade'.
Give the exact command or mechanism for 'Parse before and after writing' (e.g. the specific tomllib invocation) and for how reviewers are spawned in C5-C7.
Resolve or inline the external '<plugin-root>/skills/superreview-setup/scripts/emit-intent-guard.sh' dependency (or copy it into this skill's scripts/), and either reference or remove the unused scripts/scope-guard.sh.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is dense, prescriptive policy with essentially no explanation of concepts Claude already knows — every line states a constraint or command. It falls short of the top anchor because the approval protocol and the shared guard sentence are restated across multiple sections ("Invocation and approval", C1-C2, C2.6, upgrade) and inline version pins ("tiktoken==0.13.0", the brewcode-meta comment) could be consolidated, leaving some tightening possible. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Most guidance is executable with exact commands ("python3 -I -S scripts/prepare-tokenizer.py check", "scripts/verify-team.sh {TEAM_NAME}", "scripts/toggle-team.sh {TEAM_NAME} enable --dry-run", "emit-intent-guard.sh <project-root>"). A few steps remain high-level — "Parse before and after writing" and "spawn three independent reviewers" never specify the command or mechanism — so it sits at 'mostly executable with minor gaps' rather than fully copy-paste ready. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Modes are resolved in an explicit priority order, install is decomposed into sequenced phases C1-C9 with checkpoints at every gate: parse before/after each write, 2/3 reviewer consensus, a VERIFIED/FALSE_POSITIVE pass, at most two repair cycles, and verify-team.sh after every cycle. Destructive modes additionally name every deletion and require explicit approval, with feedback loops throughout — matching the top anchor for explicit validation and error-recovery loops. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Structure is clear: one section per mode, and the three reference files (framework-files.md, agent-template.md, cleanup-flow.md) plus all cited scripts exist and are exactly one level deep (cleanup-flow.md's Step P is real and points only to scripts, not to further documents). Minor gaps keep it below the top anchor: the body depends on an external "<plugin-root>/skills/superreview-setup/scripts/emit-intent-guard.sh" outside this bundle, and scripts/scope-guard.sh ships unreferenced. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |