Conciseness

The body is lean and assumes competence — no explanation of what git or hooks are — but the project and global settings JSON blocks are near-identical duplicates differing only in the command path, which is trimmable token cost. Efficient with minor instances that could be tightened, matching anchor 4 rather than the 'every token earns its place' of 5.

Actionability

Fully executable guidance throughout: exact copy destinations, chmod, two copy-paste-ready settings JSON blocks (with the documented "$CLAUDE_PROJECT_DIR" pattern), a merge instruction to avoid clobbering existing settings, and a concrete verification command with expected exit code 2 and stderr message. The only placeholder, <path-to-script>, is self-explanatory. Matches anchor 5's copy-paste-ready coverage of common cases.

Workflow Clarity

Five clearly sequenced steps with an explicit validation step ("Should exit with code 2 and print a BLOCKED message to stderr"), so the destructive/batch cap of 3 does not apply. It stops short of anchor 5 because there is no feedback loop — no guidance on what to do if the verification test fails to block.

Progressive Disclosure

Verified against the actual bundle: the single referenced file, [scripts/block-dangerous-git.sh](scripts/block-dangerous-git.sh), exists, is correctly linked, one level deep, and holds exactly the content that belongs outside SKILL.md (the pattern-matching logic). The body is a well-sectioned overview (blocked list, steps, verify) with no content that should be split out. Clear overview with a well-signaled one-level reference matches anchor 5.

Specificity

"block dangerous git commands (push, reset --hard, clean, branch -D, etc.) before they execute" lists several specific concrete commands with the mechanism (PreToolUse-style hook setup). It falls short of the 5 anchor's "comprehensive coverage" because the trailing "etc." admits gaps — e.g., "git checkout ." and "git restore .", which the body blocks, are absent from the description.

Completeness

Both parts are explicit and concrete: the what is "Set up Claude Code hooks to block dangerous git commands... before they execute" and the when is a full "Use when..." clause with three concrete trigger phrases. This matches the 5 anchor exactly; the 4 anchor's weaker "'when' could be more explicit" does not apply.

Trigger Term Quality

"prevent destructive git operations, add git safety hooks, or block git push/reset in Claude Code" gives good natural-phrase coverage users would actually say. Not 5: common synonyms/variants like "force push", "protect", or "git hook safety" are missing, so coverage is good but not comprehensive.

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

It carves a clear niche — PreToolUse git-blocking hooks specifically in Claude Code — with distinct triggers ("git safety hooks", "block git push/reset") that no general git or hooks skill would claim. Conflict risk is minimal, matching the 5 anchor.