Content
92%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A lean, well-structured instruction-only skill: an exact git command, a numbered workflow, and a concrete output template with no padding. The only gap is the absence of a worked example showing a completed PR description.
Suggestions
Add one short filled-in example PR description after the template so the expected output style is fully concrete.
Optionally note a fallback for branches without a main branch (e.g. use the default base branch for the three-dot diff).
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Roughly 20 lean lines with no over-explanation of concepts Claude already knows; every instruction adds value. Matches the 'lean and efficient' anchor exactly. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | The command `git diff main...HEAD` is copy-paste ready and the What/Why/Changes template is concrete. Not 5 because no filled-in example description is provided to cover the common case. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A simple single-purpose skill with a clear, unambiguous two-step sequence (diff, then write per the template). It is a read-only plus writing task, so the destructive/batch validation cap does not apply; the simple-skill exception holds. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Under 50 lines, no bundle files present, and the body is well-organized into a numbered procedure plus a clearly delimited template format. Per the rubric note, skills under 50 lines with no need for external references can score 5 with just well-organized sections. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 19 / 20 Passed |