Content
86%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
This is a clean, focused skill that does one thing well. It's concise, provides a concrete command and a clear template format, and doesn't over-explain. The main improvement opportunity would be adding a brief example of a completed PR description to make the output expectations fully concrete.
Suggestions
Add one brief example of a completed PR description to show the expected output quality and level of detail.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Every line earns its place. No unnecessary explanations of what PRs are, how git works, or other concepts Claude already knows. The template format is lean and directly usable. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides a concrete git command and a clear output format template. Minor gap: no example of a completed PR description showing what good output looks like, which would make it fully copy-paste actionable. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Clear two-step sequence (run diff, then write description). This is a simple, non-destructive skill so no validation/feedback loops are needed. Minor gap: doesn't address edge cases like what to do if there's no diff or if the branch is behind main. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | This is a simple, single-purpose skill under 50 lines with no need for external references. The content is well-organized with clear sections and the template format serves as both instruction and structure. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |