Content
86%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A tight, well-organized instruction skill with an executable command and a clear description template. It is efficient and well-structured; its only notable gap is the absence of a worked example to make the guidance fully copy-paste ready.
Suggestions
Include a short filled-in example of the What/Why/Changes template applied to a sample diff so the format is unambiguous and copy-paste ready.
Add a brief checkpoint for edge cases, such as noting what to do when the diff is empty or spans many commits.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean with no padding or explanation of concepts Claude already knows; every line (the git diff command and the What/Why/Changes template) earns its place. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | It provides one concrete executable command (`git diff main...HEAD`) and a clear description template, but lacks a filled-in example output showing the template applied to a real change. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The two-step sequence (diff, then write) is clear and unambiguous, but there are no checkpoints or guidance for edge cases (e.g. empty or very large diffs); this is not a destructive/batch operation so the cap-3 rule does not apply. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The skill is under 50 lines, well-organized into labeled sections, and needs no external references, satisfying the simple-skill exception for a top score. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |