Conciseness

The body is dense with actionable specifics (e.g. "git show HEAD:<path>", "git diff HEAD -- <skill-path>", "git checkout HEAD -- <skill-path>") and the <context> block covers flowai-specific behavior Claude would not know, with no padding about concepts Claude already knows. Matches the efficient-with-minor-trim anchor; not a 5 because the long install-mode path enumeration in step 5 and repeated "Use only project-local paths" lines could be tightened, not a 3 because it is not noticeably padded.

Actionability

Provides concrete executable commands throughout ("git diff --no-index -- <template> <artifact>", "git show HEAD:<path>/SKILL.md", subagent delegation with explicit inputs) plus specific pre-filter logic. Matches mostly-executable with minor gaps; not a 5 because commands are woven into prose rather than copy-paste blocks and subagent interfaces/todo-write usage are assumed ("e.g., todo write"), not a 3 because guidance is concrete and complete rather than pseudocode.

Workflow Clarity

The seven-step sequence has explicit validation checkpoints and feedback loops for destructive/batch file rewrites: "verify the diff actually replaces stale commands ... rerun the adapter or fix", frontmatter "byte-for-byte identical" checks, per-resource confirmation gates, "Revert rejected adaptations: git checkout HEAD", plus a dedicated <verification> checklist. Matches the clear-sequence-with-explicit-validation-and-feedback-loops anchor; not a 4 because validation is explicit rather than minor-gaps.

Progressive Disclosure

The body is well-sectioned (Overview, Rules, Instructions, Verification) and references one bundle file (assets/AGENTS.template.md) as a one-level runtime input, but step 5 inlines a ~20-line install-mode path enumeration that belongs in a separate reference, and references are not formatted as clearly signaled navigation links (no "See X for details"). Matches the some-structure-but-could-be-better-organized anchor; not a 4 because the inlined bulk and unclear reference signaling are real organization gaps, not a 2 because section structure is present and content is not an unstructured wall.

Specificity

Quotes "Adapt project-local flowai primitives (skills, agents, AGENTS.md artifacts, hooks) to project specifics" enumerate four concrete resource categories, but the single action verb "adapt ... to project specifics" is generic rather than listing multiple concrete actions, matching the anchor that names a domain with 1-2 concrete actions but is not comprehensive. It is not a 4 because no several specific actions (e.g. rewrite commands, replace examples) are enumerated, and not a 2 because the four named resource types are concrete, not minimal.

Completeness

"Adapt project-local flowai primitives ... to project specifics" gives a clear what, but the only when guidance is the weakly implied "Standalone adaptation — independent of update" with no explicit "Use when..." clause, so completeness is capped at 3 per the rubric guideline. It is not a 4 because no explicit trigger clause exists, and not a 2 because the what is clearly stated rather than vague.

Trigger Term Quality

Phrases like "skills", "agents", "hooks" are natural terms a user might say, but "flowai primitives", "AGENTS.md artifacts", and "Standalone adaptation — independent of update" are technical framing with missing common synonyms or file extensions. Matches the anchor with some relevant keywords but missing common variations; not a 4 because natural phrasing coverage is incomplete, not a 2 because more than one or two generic keywords are present.

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

The flowai-specific scope ("flowai primitives", "independent of update") carves a clear niche distinct from sibling commands, with only minor overlap risk from the broad verb "adapt" and the four resource types. Matches the mostly-distinct anchor; not a 5 because the generic action verb leaves slight overlap risk, not a 3 because the flowai framing is specific rather than broadly overlapping.