Conciseness

Mostly lean and load-bearing (taxonomy, exact jq and resume commands), but the 'Why this skill exists' preamble and some rule rationale could be trimmed without losing clarity.

Actionability

Fully executable guidance: copy-paste jq histogram commands for both codex and claude transcript formats, exact codex/claude resume commands, and concrete artefact paths cover the common cases.

Workflow Clarity

Nine clearly sequenced steps with explicit validation checkpoints (fail-closed on missing kind, cross-checking histogram vs claims, re-deriving the verdict, interview gate) and a fill-in output template acting as a checklist.

Progressive Disclosure

A single ~330-line file with clear section headers but no external references or bundle files; the failure-mode taxonomy (~90 lines) and output template are inlined where they could be split into one-level-deep reference files.

Specificity

Lists several concrete actions ('Reads the judge's rendering, the raw transcript, the primitive the agent saw and the scenario, then reports a classified diagnosis'), but relies on only two generic verbs (reads, reports) so coverage is not fully comprehensive.

Completeness

Clearly answers both what ('Reads the judge's rendering, the raw transcript... reports a classified diagnosis without fixing') and when ('Use when a judged benchmark or acceptance scenario fails and you need the cause before editing') with a concrete trigger phrase.

Trigger Term Quality

Explicit trigger phrasing with relevant terms ('judged benchmark or acceptance scenario fails', 'need the cause before editing') that the target user would naturally say, though niche and missing common synonyms like 'test/CI/run failed'.

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

Occupies a clear niche — diagnosing judged benchmark/acceptance-scenario failures and producing a report-only diagnosis — with distinct triggers and minimal overlap with other skills.