Content
82%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a lean, well-structured overview that defers volatile hook specifics to official docs and gives a clear sequenced workflow with per-host validation caveats. It loses only minor points for lacking copy-paste code/config examples and explicit validate-retry command loops.
Suggestions
Add one short copy-paste example of a normalized decision return shape and a host adapter snippet to lift actionability to fully executable.
Make the validation step a concrete validate->fix->retry loop with example commands per host to strengthen workflow_clarity's feedback-loop checkpoint.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and assumes Claude's competence, avoiding explanation of basic hook or plugin concepts; every section (Official Docs First, Workflow, Output Shape, Pitfalls) earns its place with directive, unpadded language. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides concrete, executable guidance such as specific doc URLs, an explicit normalize-input field list, and named validation caveats, but offers no copy-paste code/config snippets, leaving minor gaps in executable detail. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The six-step workflow is clearly sequenced with validation guidance per host and explicit Codex interactive-vs-non-interactive checkpoints, though validation is described as a directive rather than as a concrete validate->fix->retry feedback loop with commands. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Content is well-organized into clearly signaled sections (Official Docs First, Workflow, Output Shape, Pitfalls) with no bundle files to manage; it stays a concise overview pointing to external official docs rather than inlining spec detail, with only minor room for tighter reference signaling. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |