Content
67%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a well-structured, actionable PRD guide with a clear workflow and template. It is slightly verbose in places and fully self-contained with no external references, which is reasonable for this skill.
Suggestions
Trim the meta-commentary ('This rule is designed to apply Prompt Engineering principles...') and condense the Core Principles section to reduce token overhead.
Add one fully worked example PRD (even briefly) so the template's placeholders are demonstrably executable end-to-end.
Consider moving the full template and Bad/Good examples into a reference file, leaving SKILL.md as a concise overview with a clearly signaled link.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly efficient with a usable template and examples, but includes unnecessary padding such as 'This rule is designed to apply Prompt Engineering principles—clarity, constraints, and structure—to documentation' and an abstract Core Principles section that could be tightened. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides a copy-paste-ready PRD template with concrete section structure and concrete Bad/Good examples; minor gaps in that no fully worked end-to-end PRD example is shown. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Clear 5-step sequence (Analyze, Ask, Draft, Review, Persist) with a Review checkpoint and a CRITICAL persist-to-file instruction; no error-recovery feedback loop, but acceptable for a non-destructive document-writing task. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized with clear section headers and no nested references; the template is appropriately the core inline content. Slightly below 5 because the full template/examples could optionally live in a reference file for a leaner SKILL.md. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 15 / 20 Passed |