CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

comparison-table-generator

Deprecated compatibility entry for Comparison Table construction. This component is now maintained in Bricks; install and use component-builder to build a new Comparison Table.

64

Quality

76%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Low

Low-risk findings worth noting

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./skills/components/content/comparison-table/SKILL.md
SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

100%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

As a deprecation stub, the body is exemplary: it states the move, gives an executable install command, links directly to the successor reference, and explicitly says the entry contains no component rules. It is lean, actionable, and unambiguous with no structural overhead. There is nothing to tighten without losing information.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The body is extremely lean: a one-line statement of where the skill moved, an executable install command, and one sentence of guidance — no padding and no explanation of concepts Claude already knows. Every token earns its place, matching anchor 5.

5 / 5

Actionability

It provides a copy-paste-ready command (`npx skills add kostja94/bricks --skill component-builder`) plus a direct link to the successor's reference file and an explicit instruction to use component-builder. This fully covers the one common case for this skill, matching anchor 5.

5 / 5

Workflow Clarity

The single action is unambiguous: install the successor skill and use it. Per the rubric's simple-skill exception, a single-purpose skill with an unambiguous action can score 5; there are no destructive or batch operations requiring validation checkpoints.

5 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

The skill is under 50 lines with no external bundle files needed (no references/, scripts/, or assets/ exist); per the rubric guideline this can score 5 with well-organized sections. The single outbound link to the successor's comparison-table reference is clearly signaled and one level deep, with no nesting.

5 / 5

Total

20

/

20

Passed

Description

53%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

This is a well-executed deprecation notice: it clearly states what the entry is, where the functionality moved, and what to do instead. Its weakness is typical of deprecation stubs — no 'Use when' trigger guidance and no capability description of its own, which caps completeness and specificity. It scores reasonably but not highly as a functional skill description.

Suggestions

Add an explicit trigger clause, e.g., 'Use when the user asks to build or edit a Comparison Table' — this directly lifts the completeness dimension, which carries the highest weight (0.35).

Include natural synonyms and variations such as 'comparison table', 'feature comparison', or 'compare options table' so users phrasing the request differently still match this entry.

State concretely what action to take on a match (e.g., 'Install component-builder and use it for all Comparison Table construction') rather than only describing the entry's deprecated status.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

The description names the domain ("Comparison Table construction") and 1-2 concrete actions ("install and use component-builder to build a new Comparison Table"), but describes no actual capabilities of the skill itself. It fits anchor 3: a clear domain plus limited concrete actions, not comprehensive.

3 / 5

Completeness

The 'what' is clearly stated ("Deprecated compatibility entry... now maintained in Bricks; install and use component-builder"), but there is no 'Use when...' trigger clause or equivalent explicit guidance on when to reach for it. Per the judging guideline, a missing 'Use when' clause caps completeness at 3.

3 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

Relevant keywords like "Comparison Table" and "component-builder" are present and natural for users wanting a comparison table, but there are no synonyms or variations (e.g., "feature comparison", "compare options", "comparison matrix") — matching anchor 3 (some relevant keywords, missing common variations).

3 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

The description names a specific component (Comparison Table) and explicitly points to its successor (component-builder), making it largely distinguishable from unrelated skills. Minor overlap risk remains with the closely related component-builder skill itself, so it sits at anchor 4 rather than the fully distinct anchor 5.

4 / 5

Total

13

/

20

Passed

Validation

93%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 15 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

metadata_version

'metadata.version' is missing

Warning

Total

15

/

16

Passed

Repository
kostja94/marketing-skills
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.