CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

tab-accordion

Deprecated compatibility entry for Tabs and Accordion construction. This component is now maintained in Bricks; install and use component-builder to build a new Tabs and Accordion.

66

Quality

80%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Low

Low-risk findings worth noting

SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

100%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

As a deprecation stub, the content is exemplary: lean, unambiguous, and immediately actionable, pointing users to the maintained successor with an executable install command. There is nothing to trim and no structure to add without padding.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The body is roughly six lean lines where every token serves the redirect: what moved, where it lives, the install command, and the instruction to use the successor. There is no padding and no explanation of concepts Claude already knows, matching anchor 5.

5 / 5

Actionability

It provides a copy-paste-ready command (`npx skills add kostja94/bricks --skill component-builder`) plus a direct instruction ("Ask the agent to use component-builder to build a new Tabs and Accordion"), fully covering the redirect use case at anchor 5.

5 / 5

Workflow Clarity

This is a single-task skill whose one action — install the successor and use it — is unambiguous and explicitly stated, which per the guidelines earns a 5 for simple skills. No destructive or batch operations are involved, so no validation checkpoints are required.

5 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

The skill is under 50 lines, needs no external references of its own, and its single outbound link (the Tabs and Accordion reference in Bricks) is clearly signaled and one level deep. Per the guidelines this matches anchor 5 for short, well-organized skills.

5 / 5

Total

20

/

20

Passed

Description

61%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description is concise, honest about its deprecated status, and clearly names the domain and successor. Its main weakness is the missing "when to use" trigger clause and sparse synonym coverage, which limit discoverability and completeness scores.

Suggestions

Add an explicit trigger clause, e.g., "Use when the user asks to build tabs, accordions, or collapsible UI components" — this would raise completeness from 3 toward 4-5.

Include common synonyms and variations ("collapsible sections", "tab navigation", "disclosure widgets") to improve trigger-term coverage.

State what the skill did in its active era (e.g., "Constructs tab and accordion components") so the entry is self-describing even if the successor is unavailable.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

The description names the domain ("Tabs and Accordion construction") and a concrete action ("install and use component-builder"), matching anchor 3. It does not reach anchor 4 because, as a redirect entry, it lists only one action rather than several specific capabilities.

3 / 5

Completeness

The "what" is clear — "Deprecated compatibility entry... now maintained in Bricks; install and use component-builder" — but there is no "Use when..." clause or equivalent explicit trigger guidance, capping completeness at 3 per the judging guidelines. It is not a 2 because the "what" is concrete and unambiguous, not vague.

3 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

Natural terms like "Tabs and Accordion", "component-builder", and "Bricks" give good keyword coverage for a user seeking this functionality. It falls short of anchor 5 because common synonyms and variations (e.g., "collapsible sections", "tab layout", "toggle panels") are absent.

4 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

"Tabs and Accordion construction" carves out a clear niche with distinct triggers, and the named successor ("kostja94/bricks/component-builder") is explicit. It does not reach anchor 5 because the entry intentionally overlaps with its successor skill, creating minor conflict risk.

4 / 5

Total

14

/

20

Passed

Validation

93%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 15 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

metadata_version

'metadata.version' is missing

Warning

Total

15

/

16

Passed

Repository
kostja94/marketing-skills
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.