Conciseness

The body is lean — a decision flowchart, a quick-links table, and a key-code-locations table — with no conceptual padding or explanations of what permissions are, so every token earns its place, matching the 'lean and efficient; assumes Claude's competence' anchor; it is not the padded level 2.

Actionability

The key-code-locations table gives concrete, specific file paths with their purpose (e.g., 'packages/service/support/permission/{resource}/auth.ts — 鉴权函数'), but the actual executable steps live in referenced guide files, and no copy-paste code or complete instructions appear inline, fitting 'some concrete guidance but incomplete'; it falls short of the fully executable level 3.

Workflow Clarity

The resource-type decision flowchart sequences the initial routing clearly, but the actual multi-step integration workflow and any validation checkpoints are deferred to the guide files rather than shown, so checkpoints are missing/implicit, matching the 'steps listed but validation gaps' anchor; it is not the unclear level 1, nor the checkpointed level 3.

Progressive Disclosure

The body is well-organized as an overview with clearly signaled one-level-deep references (quick-start, full-integration, checklist, reference README), but none of those referenced files actually exist in the bundle, so the disclosure structure is promised but non-functional, fitting 'some structure but could be better organized'; it avoids level 1 because the signaling and organization are genuinely clear rather than monolithic or nested 2+ levels.

Specificity

It names the domain ('为 FastGPT 新资源接入权限管理') and a general action ('添加权限支持') but does not list multiple specific concrete actions, matching the 'names domain and some actions, but not comprehensive' anchor; it is not the vague level 1, nor the multi-action level 3.

Completeness

It explicitly states what it does ('为 FastGPT 新资源接入权限管理') and when to use it with an explicit trigger ('当用户需要为新资源...添加权限支持时触发'), clearly answering both what AND when, matching the level 3 anchor with an explicit trigger clause.

Trigger Term Quality

The trigger phrase '当用户需要为新资源（如 AgentSkill、Plugin 等）添加权限支持时触发' uses relevant natural terms and concrete resource types, but the keyword set is narrow (only 权限管理/权限支持 plus resource names) and lacks common variations, fitting 'some relevant keywords but missing common variations' rather than the rich level 3 coverage.

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

The niche is specific — FastGPT permission management scoped to particular resource types (AgentSkill, Plugin) — giving distinct triggers unlikely to overlap with unrelated skills, matching the 'clear niche with distinct triggers' anchor.