Content
77%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-engineered review workflow: concrete commands, explicit stage gating, parallelizable phases, and a ready-to-use report template. Its main defects are a missing reference bundle (all checklist links dangle) and one dense inline spec section that should live in its own file.
Suggestions
Ship the referenced checklist files (backend-quality/, frontend-quality/, style/) or inline their key checks — currently every '- []' checklist item links to a nonexistent file.
Move the long inline i18n static-key rule into a dedicated reference file (e.g. style/i18n.md) and keep only a one-line pointer in the phase checklist.
Fix or drop out-of-bundle relative links like '../../../design/api/index.md' and '../../../code/syntax.md', which point outside the skill directory.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and command-driven — 'gh pr view <number> --json ...', worktree setup, and the report template all carry actionable content with minimal padding. It only slips slightly toward over-explanation in places like '# 进入该目录安装依赖、运行测试' repeating what the commands below already show. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Nearly everything is copy-paste ready: concrete gh/git commands, a complete JSON payload for line-level review comments, pnpm tsc/test invocations, and a command reference table. The gap is that several checklist items point to files that do not exist in the bundle (e.g. './backend-quality/security.md', './style/db.md'), leaving those steps non-executable. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The sequence is explicit and gated: '步骤 0：拉取代码' → phase 1 (requirement understanding + test-case reasoning) → phases 2–6 explicitly marked '可以并行执行' → final report. It contains a real feedback loop in the '阶段门控' ('立即跳过后续阶段... 请求作者澄清或修复后再继续审查') plus validation via 'gh pr checks', 'pnpm tsc --noEmit' and 'pnpm test'. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body itself is well structured with clearly signaled one-level checklist links ('[后端安全](./backend-quality/security.md)', '[前端组件规范](./style/front.md)'), but no bundle files exist — references/, scripts/, assets/ are all absent, so every linked checklist is a dead end. The dense inline i18n rule ('禁止 t(`ns:key_${value}`)...') is also content that belongs in a separate reference file. | 3 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |