Content
90%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
An exemplary lean dev-skill body: high-density repo-specific knowledge, executable commands for setup/run/migrate/test, and a concrete numbered workflow for the core task. The main improvement opportunities are integrating a validation step into the API-capability workflow and moving detailed reference material (auth model, repo layout) into bundle files.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is dense with repo-specific facts Claude cannot know (entrypoint CLI flags, route-group self-registration, auth-type semantics, key binding rules) and contains no padding or explanation of general concepts; even the '(NOT Next.js — dev script is vite)' aside is useful disambiguation rather than filler. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Every common case has copy-paste-ready commands: 'uv sync --dev', 'uv run main.py', 'pnpm dev', the Alembic autogenerate invocation, and pytest commands, while the API-capability workflow cites exact file paths (service_operations.py, operation_docs.py, mcp/server.py) and the SDK-regeneration script. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The 'Adding an API capability' section is a clearly numbered 1–4 sequence enumerating consumers and exact paths, but validation checkpoints (e.g. running tests/unit_tests/api after wiring) are not integrated into the sequence itself — they live in a separate Tests section. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | A single well-organized file with clear sections and one-level-deep pointers (AGENTS.md, dev-docs/architecture/application-api.md, sibling skills); no bundle files exist. However, at ~145 lines, detailed material like the auth-model contracts and repo-layout tree could arguably live in reference files. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |