Content
86%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured routing skill that efficiently points to one-level-deep references with concrete verification doc pointers and project-specific Tailwind canonicals. Workflow would benefit from an explicit validate-and-retry loop.
Suggestions
Add an explicit feedback loop in 'Scope And Verification' (e.g., if a check fails, fix and re-run until passing before proceeding) to strengthen workflow_clarity.
Consider noting what a passing verification looks like or linking the specific check command, so the verify step is executable without opening the referenced docs.
Clarify the relationship of the Tailwind CSS section to the routing theme, or move it into a reference, to keep the overview purely about topic routing.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean ~28-line body with no padding and no explanation of concepts Claude already knows; project-specific Tailwind canonicals are the only concrete specifics, and every token earns its place. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Instruction-only routing skill with concrete pointers (specific reference files, web/docs/test.md, web/docs/lint.md, packages/dify-ui/docs/testing.md) and concrete Tailwind class mappings, but the actual mechanics live in the referenced docs leaving minor gaps. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Clear sequence of route → identify owner/state/contract → keep within slice → verify with named check docs, but no explicit validate→fix→retry feedback loop; this is not a destructive/batch operation so the cap-at-3 rule does not apply. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Clean overview routing to five real one-level-deep reference files with bottom-defined link refs and content appropriately split; the single second hop to an external package overlay doc is clearly signaled rather than a nested skill reference. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |