Content
92%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A tight, action-oriented skill body: an explicit multi-step workflow with validation checkpoints and feedback loops, concrete commands and API usage, and clean section organization. The main gap is that testcase examples remain illustrative rather than fully copy-paste runnable.
Suggestions
Include one complete, runnable `func TestXxx(t *testing.T)` skeleton using `clie2e.RunCmd` so the testcase pattern is copy-paste ready rather than implied.
Consider extracting the Guardrails or Testcase rules lists into a references file to keep the main body a lean overview, which would push progressive_disclosure to the top anchor.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean and imperative throughout; assumes Claude's competence (no explanation of what a test or a CLI is) and every line is actionable guidance, with examples like the coverage.md table earning their place. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete commands (`go test ./tests/cli_e2e/{domain} -count=1`, the lark-cli --help exploration block) and precise API usage (`clie2e.RunCmd`, Args/Params/Data split) are given, but the testcase code itself stays illustrative rather than a copy-paste runnable example. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A six-step sequenced workflow with explicit validation checkpoints (re-check help/schema before changing assertions, run tests while iterating and before finishing) and feedback loops for error recovery, matching the highest anchor. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized sections (Core standard, Workflow, Testcase rules, coverage.md, Guardrails) with a clear inline template and table; no bundle files exist so structure is appropriately self-contained, though one or two long lists (Guardrails, Testcase rules) could be candidates for reference files. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |