CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

lark-approval

飞书审批:查询和处理审批待办/已办/实例,搜索可发起审批定义、查看定义详情并发起原生审批实例。当用户要处理审批任务、查看审批实例、搜索或发起审批时使用。审批待办不是飞书任务;非审批类待办走 lark-task。不负责创建审批定义;三方审批定义不走原生提单。

77

Quality

100%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

100%

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

A well-structured integration skill body: actionable commands, explicit processing chains with retry/validation guardrails, and clean one-level progressive disclosure into verified reference files. It assumes Claude's competence and avoids concept explanations.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The body is dense operational guidance — routing rules, a command table, processing chains, an error-code decision tree — with no padding or explanation of concepts Claude already knows; minor inter-section restatement is operationally load-bearing rather than filler.

3 / 3

Actionability

Concrete executable commands throughout: a per-task command table mapping to reference files, explicit topic codes ('topic:1待办 2已办 17未读 18已读'), copy-paste bash examples, and a parameter-pairing rule ('instance_code + task_id 必须成对带上').

3 / 3

Workflow Clarity

Multi-step chains are explicit ('approvals search -> approvals get -> instances create'; 'tasks query ... → instances get → 执行操作') with validation checkpoints and a feedback loop: the 1395001 decision tree caps retries at 1 and forbids the query/write loop.

3 / 3

Progressive Disclosure

The SKILL.md is an overview that points to one-level-deep reference files via a clearly signaled table, each reference (e.g. lark-approval-tasks-approve.md, lark-approval-initiate.md) verified to exist in ./references/, with 'references 是第一信息源' establishing navigation priority.

3 / 3

Total

12

/

12

Passed

Description

100%

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

A high-quality description: third-person, concrete actions, explicit use-when triggers, and clear disambiguation against adjacent skills. It avoids fluff and verbosity while covering what, when, and boundaries.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

The description lists multiple concrete actions — '查询和处理审批待办/已办/实例,搜索可发起审批定义、查看定义详情并发起原生审批实例' — naming specific operations rather than vague capabilities.

3 / 3

Completeness

It answers both 'what' (query/process to-dos, instances, definitions, initiate) and 'when' with an explicit '当用户要...时使用' trigger clause, satisfying the both-what-and-when bar.

3 / 3

Trigger Term Quality

It surfaces natural user phrasings — '处理审批任务、查看审批实例、搜索或发起审批' — covering the common ways a user would request approval handling.

3 / 3

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

Explicit boundary statements — '审批待办不是飞书任务;非审批类待办走 lark-task' and '不负责创建审批定义;三方审批定义不走原生提单' — carve a clear niche and actively prevent mis-routing.

3 / 3

Total

12

/

12

Passed

Validation

75%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation12 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

metadata_version

'metadata.version' is missing

Warning

metadata_field

'metadata' should map string keys to string values

Warning

frontmatter_unknown_keys

Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata

Warning

relative_links

Relative link issues: 3 suspicious

Warning

Total

12

/

16

Passed

Repository
larksuite/cli
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.