Content
88%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is highly actionable with clear workflow sequencing and explicit validation checkpoints. Minor conciseness trims and slightly tighter organization of the inline detection tables would push it to full marks.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Largely efficient tables and actionable guidance that assume Claude's competence, with minor over-explanation in the restated 'weak evidence' examples and redundant STOP lines that could be trimmed. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Fully actionable for a detection task: specific indicator files, per-stack entrypoint paths, exact search terms, and copy-ready structured-question prompts covering common cases. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Clear numbered sequence (1 through 6, confirmation, decision tree) with explicit BLOCKING validation checkpoints and feedback loops (re-run detection after user input). | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized with clearly signaled one-level-deep references (recipes.md, parent/sibling SKILL.md); no bundle directory exists, and the bulk detection tables are reasonably inlined rather than split out. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |