Content
85%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
This is a well-structured routing/lookup skill with strong actionability and workflow clarity. The main weakness is redundancy: the removal/staleness constraint is repeated in nearly identical form across four sections (Scope Boundary, Step 3, Step 4, and Important Context), consuming tokens without adding new information. Otherwise, the skill is operationally clear, properly scoped, and provides concrete tool names and routing paths.
Suggestions
Consolidate the removal/staleness routing instructions into a single authoritative section (e.g., Scope Boundary) and reference it from Steps 3/4 rather than restating the full constraint and routing message three times.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The skill is mostly efficient but has notable redundancy — the removal/staleness routing instructions are stated three separate times (Scope Boundary, Step 3, Step 4, and Important Context) with nearly identical content. The core workflow is clear but could be tightened by consolidating the repeated constraints. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | The skill provides concrete, specific guidance: exact MCP tool names to call, a clear disambiguation protocol, a defined summary output structure (key, name, state, off variation, fallthrough, complexity, URL), a routing table with relative paths, and exact phrasing for the routing message. This is copy-paste-ready operational guidance. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The four-step workflow is clearly sequenced with explicit decision points: parse → resolve (with disambiguation branching) → summarize (with conditional routing for removal questions) → route. Each step has clear criteria for proceeding, and the disambiguation step serves as a validation checkpoint before fetching full details. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | The skill is well-structured with clear sections (Scope Boundary, Prerequisites, Command Contract, Workflow, Output Style, Important Context) and routes to four other skills via relative paths for deeper workflows. For a skill with no bundle files, the content is appropriately self-contained at the overview level with one-level-deep references to sibling skills. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |