Content
77%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
This is a well-structured command-routing skill with clear workflow steps, concrete tool references, and good boundary enforcement. Its main weakness is the triple-repetition of the removal/staleness routing constraint, which wastes tokens and could be consolidated into a single authoritative section. The routing table and disambiguation logic are strong actionable elements.
Suggestions
Consolidate the removal/staleness routing instructions into a single authoritative section (e.g., Scope Boundary) and reference it from Steps 3 and 4 instead of restating the full constraint three times.
Consider extracting the routing table and detailed step descriptions into a companion reference file if additional flags or routing targets are added in the future.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The skill is mostly efficient but has notable redundancy — the removal/staleness routing instructions are stated three separate times (Scope Boundary, Step 3, Step 4, and again in Important Context). This repetition inflates token count without adding clarity. Otherwise, it respects Claude's intelligence and avoids explaining basic concepts. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | The skill provides concrete, specific guidance: exact MCP tool names to call, a clear step-by-step resolution workflow, specific output fields to return, a routing table with relative paths, and exact phrasing for the routing message. While there's no executable code, this is an instruction-only skill where the guidance is fully actionable. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The four-step workflow is clearly sequenced with explicit decision points: parse input → resolve with disambiguation logic → return summary → route to follow-up. Each step has clear branching conditions (no query → ask, multiple matches → disambiguate, no matches → suggest broader query). The read-only nature means destructive operations aren't a concern, so validation checkpoints aren't needed. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | The skill references other skills via relative paths in the routing table (flag-create, flag-targeting, flag-discovery, flag-cleanup), which is good navigation. However, all content is inline in a single file that runs fairly long, and there are no bundle files to offload detailed reference material. The repeated removal/staleness instructions could have been consolidated or extracted. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 10 / 12 Passed |