Conciseness

The body is table- and bullet-driven with almost no explanation of concepts Claude already knows (no 'what feature flags are' padding), and detailed env/consent rules are correctly delegated to the apply skill. A few sentences are repetitive — the credentials rule in Prerequisites restates parent guidance, and the 'do not skip ahead' warning appears twice — keeping it below the lean 'every token earns its place' anchor.

Actionability

Guidance is concrete for an orchestrator skill: a numbered table of the three nested skills with each one's role, explicit short-circuit conditions, and actionable rules ('Prefer TypeScript in TypeScript projects', 'Add .env.example entries when the project uses dotenv', dependency-scope consent rule). It is not a 5 because the executable details (commands, init code) all live in the referenced nested files, and a few directives resolve to cross-references ('see parent Prerequisites') rather than inline specifics.

Workflow Clarity

The three-step sequence is explicit with per-step roles, an explicit short-circuit condition from the detect decision tree, blocking vs non-blocking decision points defined, and an evidence-based checkpoint ('never summarize the second SDK as done without lockfile + entrypoint evidence') plus a compile check in apply. It is not a 5 because the error-recovery loop for a failed compile check is not described at this level, and the 'what happens after Step 3' continuation relies on the parent skill.

Progressive Disclosure

The body is a clean overview that points to one-level-deep, clearly signaled references: each nested skill is linked where it is used, the key-types table is explicitly labeled a summary with a pointer to the full rules in apply Step 2, shared references are listed once, and a final References section enumerates everything for navigation. No nested-reference chains or buried links, matching the 'clear overview with well-signaled one-level-deep references' anchor.

Specificity

The description lists several concrete actions — 'Install and initialize the correct LaunchDarkly SDK' plus running the nested skills 'detect, plan, apply' in order — which matches the anchor for several specific actions with minor gaps (it omits env wiring, dual-SDK, and package-install specifics). It is not a 5 because coverage is not comprehensive, and not a 3 because more than 1–2 actions are named.

Completeness

The 'what' is explicit ('Install and initialize the correct LaunchDarkly SDK... by running nested skills in order') and the 'when' is stated via 'during onboarding' plus the pointer that 'Parent onboarding Step 4 is first flag'. It is not a 5 because the when-clause is terse and structural rather than a concrete trigger phrase, and not a 3 because both what and when are explicitly present.

Trigger Term Quality

Natural terms a user would say are present: 'Install', 'initialize', 'LaunchDarkly SDK', 'onboarding', and 'first flag'. A few natural variations are missing ('set up', 'integrate LaunchDarkly', language names), so it fits 'good keyword coverage; a few natural terms missing' rather than the comprehensive synonym coverage of a 5.

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

'LaunchDarkly SDK' pins a clear niche with distinct triggers (SDK install/initialize during onboarding), so it is unlikely to fire for unrelated skills. This matches the 'clear niche with distinct triggers; minimal conflict risk' anchor exactly.