Content
92%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content is highly actionable and concise with a clear validated workflow; the only softer dimension is progressive disclosure, since some inline multi-provider detail could be externalized and no bundled reference files accompany the skill.
Suggestions
Consider moving the per-provider conversion snippets into a dedicated references file (one level deep) to keep SKILL.md as an overview and improve progressive disclosure.
If multi-provider tracking payloads belong with this skill, bundle the referenced ../built-in-metrics files locally so the skill is self-contained.
Add a short top-of-file pointer/TOC to the per-provider sections so navigation to a specific provider is immediate.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean: concrete JSON payloads, a compact provider-conversion table, and executable Python snippets with no padding explaining what function calling is; every section earns its place for a genuinely multi-provider task. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides fully executable JSON request bodies, complete per-provider Python conversion snippets, exact MCP tool names, and exact stop-reason checks per provider — copy-paste ready. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear four-step sequence (identify → create → attach → verify) with an explicit verification step and recovery guidance (clobber-warning, 'report the bug'), satisfying the validation-checkpoint requirement. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | No bundled references/scripts/assets exist in this skill; the body relies on cross-skill ../built-in-metrics references that are one level deep and clearly signaled, but the inline per-provider conversion snippets are content that could arguably be split out. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |