Content
88%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is highly actionable with executable code, a clear validated workflow, and well-organized sections; the main gap is that detailed per-provider tracking references live outside the skill's own bundle rather than in local reference files.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Content is largely efficient and assumes Claude's competence (no re-explanation of what tools or JSON Schema are); only minor dense sections in the provider table could be trimmed, matching the 'efficient; minor over-explanation' anchor. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides concrete MCP tool names, exact JSON payloads, per-provider schema shapes, and copy-paste-ready Python snippets covering the common cases, matching the 'fully executable; copy-paste ready' anchor. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear 4-step sequence (Identify, Create, Attach, Verify) with an explicit verification step and report-results checklist; the destructive-clobber warning adds an explicit feedback loop, matching the top anchor. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized sections with clearly signaled one-level-deep references to per-provider tracking files; references live in a sibling skill's bundle rather than this skill's own, so structure is good but not the ideal self-contained split. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |