Automatic agent selection and intelligent task routing. Analyzes user requests and automatically selects the best specialist agent(s) without requiring explicit user mentions.
38
22%
Does it follow best practices?
Impact
Pending
No eval scenarios have been run
Passed
No known issues
Optimize this skill with Tessl
npx tessl skill review --optimize ./.agent/skills/intelligent-routing/SKILL.mdPurpose: Automatically analyze user requests and route them to the most appropriate specialist agent(s) without requiring explicit user mentions.
The AI should act as an intelligent Project Manager, analyzing each request and automatically selecting the best specialist(s) for the job.
Before responding to ANY user request, perform automatic analysis:
graph TD
A[User Request: Add login] --> B[ANALYZE]
B --> C[Keywords]
B --> D[Domains]
B --> E[Complexity]
C --> F[SELECT AGENT]
D --> F
E --> F
F --> G[security-auditor + backend-specialist]
G --> H[AUTO-INVOKE with context]Use this matrix to automatically select agents:
| User Intent | Keywords | Selected Agent(s) | Auto-invoke? |
|---|---|---|---|
| Authentication | "login", "auth", "signup", "password" | security-auditor + backend-specialist | ✅ YES |
| UI Component | "button", "card", "layout", "style" | frontend-specialist | ✅ YES |
| Mobile UI | "screen", "navigation", "touch", "gesture" | mobile-developer | ✅ YES |
| API Endpoint | "endpoint", "route", "API", "POST", "GET" | backend-specialist | ✅ YES |
| Database | "schema", "migration", "query", "table" | database-architect + backend-specialist | ✅ YES |
| Bug Fix | "error", "bug", "not working", "broken" | debugger | ✅ YES |
| Test | "test", "coverage", "unit", "e2e" | test-engineer | ✅ YES |
| Deployment | "deploy", "production", "CI/CD", "docker" | devops-engineer | ✅ YES |
| Security Review | "security", "vulnerability", "exploit" | security-auditor + penetration-tester | ✅ YES |
| Performance | "slow", "optimize", "performance", "speed" | performance-optimizer | ✅ YES |
| Image Generation | "image", "generate logo", "picture", "art" | aesthetic-agent | ✅ YES |
| New Feature | "build", "create", "implement", "new app" | orchestrator → multi-agent | ⚠️ ASK FIRST |
| Complex Task | Multiple domains detected | orchestrator → multi-agent | ⚠️ ASK FIRST |
Before responding to ANY request:
// Pseudo-code for decision tree
function analyzeRequest(userMessage) {
// 1. Classify request type
const requestType = classifyRequest(userMessage);
// 2. Detect domains
const domains = detectDomains(userMessage);
// 3. Determine complexity
const complexity = assessComplexity(domains);
// 4. Select agent(s)
if (complexity === "SIMPLE" && domains.length === 1) {
return selectSingleAgent(domains[0]);
} else if (complexity === "MODERATE" && domains.length <= 2) {
return selectMultipleAgents(domains);
} else {
return "orchestrator"; // Complex task
}
}When auto-selecting an agent, inform the user concisely:
🤖 **Applying knowledge of `@security-auditor` + `@backend-specialist`...**
[Proceed with specialized response]Benefits:
| Domain | Patterns | Agent |
|---|---|---|
| Security | auth, login, jwt, password, hash, token | security-auditor |
| Frontend | component, react, vue, css, html, tailwind | frontend-specialist |
| Backend | api, server, express, fastapi, node | backend-specialist |
| Mobile | react native, flutter, ios, android, expo | mobile-developer |
| Database | prisma, sql, mongodb, schema, migration | database-architect |
| Testing | test, jest, vitest, playwright, cypress | test-engineer |
| DevOps | docker, kubernetes, ci/cd, pm2, nginx | devops-engineer |
| Debug | error, bug, crash, not working, issue | debugger |
| Performance | slow, lag, optimize, cache, performance | performance-optimizer |
| SEO | seo, meta, analytics, sitemap, robots | seo-specialist |
| Game | unity, godot, phaser, game, multiplayer | game-developer |
| Images/Art | image, logo, background, mockup, icon, picture | aesthetic-agent |
Check for implicit visual needs in Frontend tasks:
| Request Pattern | Action |
|---|---|
| "Create landing page" | Auto-add aesthetic-agent (Hero/Logo needed) |
| "Add testimonial section" | Auto-add aesthetic-agent (Avatars needed) |
| "New blog post layout" | Auto-add aesthetic-agent (Thumbnail needed) |
| "Hero section" | Auto-add aesthetic-agent |
⚠️ Rule: If a frontend task involves high-impact visuals, ALWAYS pair
frontend-specialistwithaesthetic-agent.
If request matches 2+ domains from different categories, automatically use orchestrator:
Example: "Create a secure login system with dark mode UI"
→ Detected: Security + Frontend
→ Auto-invoke: orchestrator
→ Orchestrator will handle: security-auditor, frontend-specialist, test-engineerAction: Auto-invoke respective agent
Action: Auto-invoke relevant agents sequentially
Action: Auto-invoke orchestrator → will ask Socratic questions
DO inform which expertise is being applied:
🤖 **Applying knowledge of `@frontend-specialist`...**
I will create the component with the following characteristics:
[Continue with specialized response]The user should not notice a difference from talking to the right specialist directly.
User can still explicitly mention agents:
User: "Use @backend-specialist to review this"
→ Override auto-selection
→ Use explicitly mentioned agentUser: "How does React work?"
→ Type: QUESTION
→ No agent needed
→ Respond directly with explanationUser: "Make it better"
→ Complexity: UNCLEAR
→ Action: Ask clarifying questions first
→ Then route to appropriate agentUser: "Add mobile support to the web app"
→ Conflict: mobile vs web
→ Action: Ask: "Do you want responsive web or native mobile app?"
→ Then route accordingly/orchestrate: Explicit orchestration modeDifference: User doesn't need to know the command exists.
User: "Create a dark mode toggle button"
Expected: Auto-invoke frontend-specialist
Verify: Response shows "Using @frontend-specialist"User: "Review the authentication flow for vulnerabilities"
Expected: Auto-invoke security-auditor
Verify: Security-focused analysisUser: "Build a chat application with real-time notifications"
Expected: Auto-invoke orchestrator
Verify: Multiple agents coordinated (backend, frontend, test)User: "Login is not working, getting 401 error"
Expected: Auto-invoke debugger
Verify: Systematic debugging approachIf this is the first interaction in a project:
💡 **Tip**: I am configured with automatic specialist agent selection.
I will always choose the most suitable specialist for your task. You can
still mention agents explicitly with `@agent-name` if you prefer.Add to GEMINI.md temporarily:
## DEBUG: Intelligent Routing
Show selection reasoning:
- Detected domains: [list]
- Selected agent: [name]
- Reasoning: [why]intelligent-routing skill enables:
✅ Zero-command operation (no need for /orchestrate)
✅ Automatic specialist selection based on request analysis
✅ Transparent communication of which expertise is being applied
✅ Seamless integration with existing workflows
✅ Override capability for explicit agent mentions
✅ Fallback to orchestrator for complex tasks
Result: User gets specialist-level responses without needing to know the system architecture.
Next Steps: Integrate this skill into GEMINI.md TIER 0 rules.
7114206
If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.