Content
72%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content is well-organized, concise, and action-oriented with a clear sequenced workflow and verification commands. Its main weakness is the absence of executable code examples and an explicit error-recovery feedback loop around the verification step.
Suggestions
Add at least one minimal copy-paste-ready component template (e.g., a stub .tsx with CVA + data-spark-component) so the guidance reaches fully-executable actionability.
Turn the Verify step into an explicit feedback loop: 'If lint/typecheck/tests fail, fix the reported issues and re-run until all pass before considering the component complete.'
Consider moving the per-file conventions (stories CSF structure, doc.mdx section order) into a bundled reference file and signaling it from SKILL.md to deepen progressive disclosure as the skill grows.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is bullet-driven and lean, with no conceptual padding or explanation of things Claude already knows (e.g., TypeScript, CVA); every section earns its place, fitting the lean-and-efficient anchor. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | It gives concrete file names, tooling (Vitest+RTL, CVA, Storybook CSF), and real commands (npm run lint/typecheck/test), but as a checklist rather than executable/copy-paste component code, so it stops short of the fully-executable level 3. | 2 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | Steps are clearly sequenced 1–10 with an explicit terminal verify step and concrete commands, but it lacks an explicit validate→fix→retry feedback loop, leaving checkpoints present yet without error-recovery guidance. | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | The skill is single-purpose with well-organized sections and no nested/deep references; the only referenced paths are external repo locations, so the simple-skill allowance applies and the structure is clear. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 10 / 12 Passed |