Content
85%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A high-quality, highly actionable workflow with strong progressive disclosure and validation checkpoints. The main weakness is conciseness — the skill-context section and repeated Angie guidance add padding that could be trimmed.
Suggestions
Tighten the skill-context section (Step 0): the nested-CLAUDE.md analogy is explained at length; condense to a short rule that skill-context overrides general rules and apply to all artifacts.
Consolidate the Angie-over-Nginx preference, which currently appears in three separate places (Step 1.3, Step 2.5, Step 4.2), into a single stated rule referenced where needed.
Remove restated justifications (e.g. 'This prevents generating non-existent image tags') where the preceding instruction is already self-explanatory.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is mostly efficient with concrete detection tables and commands, but contains some unnecessary explanation — the skill-context analogy is restated at length and the Angie preference is repeated in three places — that could be tightened. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides concrete, copy-paste-ready Glob/Grep/Read commands, base-image mapping tables, and specific hardening directives (read_only, cap_drop, user) that fully cover the common cases. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clearly sequenced multi-step process (Steps 0–9) with mode determination, validation checkpoints, quality-check checkboxes, and explicit feedback loops (e.g. fix-before-presenting, offer-to-fix on failing checks). | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Acts as a well-organized overview with one-level-deep, clearly-signaled references (BEST-PRACTICES, SECURITY-CHECKLIST, ANGIE-ACME, etc.), each given with its purpose; all referenced files exist in references/. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |