Content
85%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured, actionable reliability-gate workflow with explicit validation gates and feedback loops. Its only weakness is conciseness: the skill-context preamble and restated core rule add tokens that could be tightened without losing meaning.
Suggestions
Trim Step 0's skill-context block: collapse the repeated emphatic reminders ("CRITICAL", "MANDATORY", "Do NOT ignore...") into a single concise statement that skill-context rules override these defaults and must be enforced.
State the 100/100 confidence rule once (either the intro or Step 4) and reference it rather than restating it, to remove redundancy.
Consider whether the skill-context preamble belongs inline or could move to a referenced file, keeping the core gate workflow as the lean spine of the body.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly efficient instruction content, but Step 0's skill-context block carries redundant emphatic padding ("CRITICAL", "MANDATORY", repeated "Do NOT ignore...") and the 100/100 rule is restated across the intro and Step 4. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides concrete actionable guidance: a 3-way classification taxonomy, a hard rule converting unsupported claims to unknowns, and strict copy-paste-ready output templates with literal structure. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | Sequenced Step 0\u21925 with explicit validation checkpoints (Step 3 verify-or-refuse, Step 4 confidence gate) and feedback loops, plus a patch guardrail for the destructive case. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized into clear header sections with a single clearly-signaled, one-level-deep external reference (the skill-context file); no bundle files exist to evaluate against. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |