Content
85%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured overview skill: tight tables, an explicit workflow with validation, a recovery feedback loop, a pre-flight checklist, and clean one-level-deep disclosure into a real per-capability reference bundle. The only weaknesses are minor: the capability-guard rule is stated three times, and the core code example contains placeholder comments instead of one fully runnable registration.
Suggestions
State the 'guard each registration on every capability its behavior depends on' rule once (e.g., in 'Core mod shape') and have the workflow step and pre-flight checklist reference it by name instead of restating it in full.
Replace the '/* ... */' placeholders in the core mod shape with one complete minimal registration (e.g., a real tool name, description, and schema) so the template is copy-paste runnable.
Deduplicate the repeated 'Do not create project mods' rule, keeping it in one authoritative location (the Rules section) and linking to it from the location table.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is dense and app-specific (capabilities, ctx handles, disposers — none of which Claude would already know), but there is noticeable repetition: the 'guard on every capability the behavior depends on' guidance appears three times ('Core mod shape' prose, the checklist, and implicitly in step 8), and 'Do not create project mods' appears at lines 21 and 120. Not 5 because those duplicates could be trimmed without losing clarity; not 3 because the overwhelming majority of tokens are non-obvious, Letta-specific content with no generic padding. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | The core mod shape is a near-complete executable template, recovery commands are concrete ('letta --no-mods', 'LETTA_DISABLE_MODS=1 letta'), and the diagnostics path is exact ('~/.letta/mods/diagnostics/latest.json'). Not 5 because the central code example uses '/* ... */' placeholders inside both register calls, so it is not copy-paste runnable; not 3 because the surrounding guidance is specific and executable apart from those placeholders, with details correctly delegated to reference files. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The 9-step workflow is clearly sequenced with an explicit validation step (step 8 'Do a basic review'), a dedicated 'Pre-flight checklist for complex mods', and an explicit error-recovery feedback loop ('If a mod breaks startup or command handling, recover with letta --no-mods'). This matches anchor 5 — clear sequence, explicit validation, feedback loops, and a checklist for complex cases. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is a lean overview with two well-signaled 'load when' tables pointing one level deep into nine real reference files (all present in references/, verified); reference files cross-link only by bare filename within the same level, with no multi-level chaining. Content is appropriately split per capability, matching the anchor-5 structure exactly. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |