Content
86%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a tight, well-structured overview that routes to real reference files via need-based triggers. Its main gap is the absence of an inline minimal code example and an explicit verification step in the workflow.
Suggestions
Add a short inline minimal `activate` example in the body so the common 'create a simple statusline' case is copy-paste ready without opening references/examples.md.
Insert an explicit verification checkpoint in the workflow (e.g., after editing, tell the user to run /reload and confirm the new statusline renders) to lift workflow_clarity.
Optionally note what failure looks like (panel not registering, capabilities missing) so Claude can self-diagnose when the statusline does not appear.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean and efficient with no padding or explanation of concepts Claude already knows; assumes competence and every token earns its place. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete paths, APIs (row/columns/chalk, panel.update/close, order: 0) and rules are given, but the body lacks an inline copy-paste minimal mod example, deferring that to references/examples.md. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear 9-step sequenced workflow with existence checks and capability guards, but no explicit validation/verification checkpoint (e.g., confirm the mod loads after /reload). | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Clear overview with well-signaled, one-level-deep references routed by need (migration.md, api.md, examples.md, plus creating-mods/architecture.md); all referenced files exist and content is appropriately split. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |