Content
72%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is lean, well-organized, and offers concrete field-level guidance, but it stops short of giving the executable REST API call and omits any success-validation or error-handling step.
Suggestions
Add an executable example of the create-issue REST call (endpoint, curl command with headers, and a sample JSON/ADF payload) so the core action is copy-paste ready.
Include a validation step after creation (e.g., confirm the response returns an issue key, handle non-2xx responses) to close the workflow feedback loop.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean ~30-line body with no concept explanations or padding; assumes Claude knows ADF and REST APIs and every section is actionable. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides concrete specifics (Issue Type ID 10002, browse URL, ADF section order, component inference, git show), but for an API skill never gives the actual endpoint, curl command, or request payload for the core "create the issue" action. | 2 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | Steps are clearly sequenced as sections (Input, Gather Information, Required Fields, Create the Ticket, Output), but there is no validation checkpoint or error-handling/feedback loop for the API call. | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | Under 50 lines with clean, well-organized sections and no need for external references (no bundle files present), satisfying the simple-skill guideline for a full score. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 10 / 12 Passed |