A concise, well-structured skill body that respects token budget and encodes genuinely non-obvious LPD project conventions. Its main weakness is actionability: the REST API call itself is described only abstractly, with no executable example of the create request or its payload.

Suggestions

Add a concrete create-issue example (curl or HTTP request) showing the endpoint, authentication approach, and a minimal JSON payload with the required fields.

Include a short ADF description template so the Description/Acceptance Criteria/Reference section structure is copy-paste ready rather than prose-described.

Add a validation step after creation (e.g., confirm the response returns a key and report errors to the user) to close the workflow's checkpoint gap.

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Conciseness	The body is lean and every token earns its place: project-specific facts (Issue Type ID 10002, the bug-vs-task field differences, the browse URL pattern) are exactly what Claude would not already know, with no padding or explanation of known concepts.	5 / 5
Actionability	Concrete specifics exist ("inspect the commit with git show", "Issue Type: Task (ID: 10002)", the exact browse URL), but the core step "Create the issue in the LPD project" gives no endpoint, authentication, or request payload example — key execution details are missing, matching the "some concrete guidance but incomplete" anchor.	3 / 5
Workflow Clarity	The section order forms a clear sequence (Input → Gather Information → Required Fields → Create → Output) with an implicit checkpoint (fetch components and match by name before creating); the gap is that no validation of the creation response is specified, so it fits "clear sequence with most checkpoints present" rather than the explicit-validation anchor.	4 / 5
Progressive Disclosure	This is a short (~30 line) single-purpose skill with no bundle files and no need for external references; the well-organized sections satisfy the simple-skill exception for a top progressive-disclosure score.	5 / 5
	Total	17 / 20 Passed

Description

78%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description is a strong example of the what-plus-when pattern: a concrete capability statement followed by an explicit trigger clause in third person. Its only weakness is modest keyword coverage and slight overlap risk with sibling Jira ticket-creation skills.

Suggestions

Add one or two natural trigger variations (e.g., "open a ticket" or "create an LPD issue") to broaden keyword coverage.

If a sibling skill creates Jira bugs in LPD, sharpen the distinction in the trigger clause (e.g., "for non-bug work items") to reduce overlap risk.

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Specificity	"Create a Jira task in the LPD project through the REST API" names the domain and a single concrete action (create a task via REST API), matching the anchor for 1-2 concrete actions without comprehensive coverage; a score of 4 would require several specific actions listed.	3 / 5
Completeness	It explicitly answers both: the what ("Create a Jira task in the LPD project through the REST API") and the when ("Use when the user asks to create a Jira task or LPD task ticket") with concrete trigger phrases, matching the top anchor.	5 / 5
Trigger Term Quality	"create a Jira task or LPD task ticket" contains natural phrases users would say, with good keyword coverage (Jira task, LPD task ticket); a few natural variations like "issue" or plain "ticket" are missing, so it does not reach comprehensive synonym coverage.	4 / 5
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk	The LPD project and task-specific triggers form a clear niche with minimal conflict risk, but "Jira task" could minorly overlap with closely related ticket-creation skills (e.g., bug creation, which the body implies exists), fitting the "mostly distinct" anchor rather than the fully distinct one.	4 / 5
	Total	16 / 20 Passed

Validation

87%

Warnings & errors only

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 14 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

Criteria	Description	Result
allowed_tools_field	'allowed-tools' contains unusual tool name(s)	Warning
frontmatter_unknown_keys	Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata	Warning

	Total	14 / 16 Passed

Repository: liferay/liferay-portal
Path: .claude/skills/jira-task/SKILL.md
Commit: 3aa9365

Reviewed: 14 days ago

Table of Contents

Discovery Implementation Validation

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.